Fifty Years of Nomos
The Yearbook of the Ameri=
can
Society for Political and Legal Philosophy
<=
/b>
<=
/b>
General Editors of Nomos:
Carl J. Friederich, volumes I-IX
J. Roland Pennock, IX-XXXI, and John W.
Chapman, volumes IX- XXXV
Ian Shapiro, volumes XXXV- XLII
Stephen Macedo, volumes XLII-XLVI<=
/o:p>
Melissa S. Williams, volumes XLVI-=
Nomos I: Authority (=
ed. Carl
J. Friedrich), 1958
- Charles W. Hendel, “An Exploration of=
the
Nature of Authority”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Authority, Reason=
, and
Discretion”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Authority, Values,=
and
Policy”
- Jerome Hall, “Authority and the
Law”
- Frank H. Knight, “Authority and the F=
ree
Society”
- Hannah Arendt, “What Was Authority?&#=
8221;
- Norman Jacobson, “Knowledge, Traditio=
n, and
Authority: A Note on the American Experience”
- George E. Gordon Caitlin, “Authority =
and
Its Critics”
- Wolfgang H. Kraus, “Authority, Progre=
ss,
and Colonialism”
- Bertrand de Jouvenal, “Authority: The
Efficient Imperative”
- David Easton, “The Perception of Auth=
ority
and Social Change”
- Talcott Parsons, “Authority, Legitima=
tion,
and Political Action”
- E. Adamson Hoebel, “Authority in Prim=
itive
Societies”
Nomos II: Community (=
ed. Carl
J. Friedrich), 1959
- Carl J. Friedrich, “The Concept of
Community in Political and Legal Philosophy” <=
/li>
- Huntington Cairns,
“The Community as the Legal Order”
- Stuart M. Brown, Jr., “The Community =
as the
Legal Order Reviewed”
- William Y. Elliot, “The Co-Organic Co=
ncept
of Community Applied to Legal Analysis: Constitutional and Totalitarian
Regimes Compared” =
- Dante Germino, “The Crisis in Communi=
ty:
Challenge to Political Theory”&=
nbsp;
- Jacob Taubes, “Communitu—After =
the
Apocalypse” <=
/o:p>
- George E. Gordon Caitlin, “The Meanin=
g of
Community”
- Benjamin Nelson, “Community—Dre=
ams
and Realities”
- Talcott Parsons, “The Principle Struc=
tures
of Community: A Sociological View”
- Thomas A. Cowan, “The Principle Struc=
ture
of Community Reviewed”
- Warren Roberts, “Community as
Matrix”
- Herbert W. Schneider, “Community,
Communication, and Communion”&n=
bsp;
- Wolfgang H. Kraus, “The Democratic
Community and the Problem of Publicity”
- Lon Fuller, “Governmental Secrecy and=
the
Forms of Social Order”
- John Ladd, “The Concept of Community:=
A
Logical Analysis” =
Nomos III: Responsibility (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1960
- J. Roland Pennock, “The Problem of Re=
sponsibility”
- Ludwig Freund,
“Responsibility—Definitions, Distinctions, and Application=
s in
Various Contexts” =
- George A. Schrader, “Responsibility a=
nd
Existence”
- Margaret Spahr, “The Role of the Supr=
eme
Court in the Integration of the American Community”
- Wayne A. Leys, “Platonic, Pragmatic, =
and
Political Responsibility”
- Edgar Bodenheimer, “Is Punishment
Obsolete?”
- Richard B. Brandt, “The Conditions of
Criminal Responsibility”
- Henry Weihofen, “Retribution is
Obsolete”
- K.J. Newman, “Punishment and the Brea=
kdown
of the Legal Order: The Experience in East Paki=
stan”
- Thomas E. Davitt, “Criminal Responsib=
ility
and Punishment”
- Joel Feinberg, “On Justifying Legal
Punishment”
- Frank H. Knight, “”Political
Responsibility in a Democracy”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “The Dilemma of
Administrative Responsibility”
- Warren Roberts, “Reflections on
Administration Integrity”
- John W. Chapman, “Metropolitan Citize=
nship:
Promises and Limitations”
- Ar=
nold S. Kaufman, “Human Nature and
Participatory Democracy”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Responsibility and=
the
Goal of Survival” =
- John Austin, “Three Ways of Spilling InkR=
21;
Nomos IV: Liberty (ed. Carl J. Friedrich)<=
/u>, 1962
- Leonard Krieger, “Stages in the Histo=
ry of
Political Freedom”
- I. Fetscher, “Rousseau’s Concep=
ts of
Freedom in Light of His Philosophy of History”=
- Albert A. Mavrinac, “Freedom, Authori=
ty,
Conscience, and Development: Mill, Acton, and Some Contemporary Cathol=
ic
Thinkers”
- William Ebenstein, “John Stuart Mill:
Political and Economic Li=
berty”
- Frank H. Knight, “Some Notes on Polit=
ical
Freedom and On a Famous Essay”
- Henry D. Aiken, “Mill and the Justifi=
cation
of Social Freedom”
- Elizabeth F. Flower, “Mill and Some P=
resent
Concerns About Ethical Judgments”
- Margaret Spahr, “Mill on Paternalism =
In Its
Place”
- David Spitz, “Freedom and Individuali=
ty:
Mil’s Liberty in Retrospect”=
- Harry W. Jones, “Freedom and Opportun=
ity as
Competing Social Values: Mill’s Liberty and Ours”=
- Arnold<=
span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'> Brecht, “Liberty and Truth: The Responsibil=
ity of
Science”
- Mark DeWolfe Howe, “Problems of Relig=
ious
Liberty”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Freedom—an
Empirical Interpretation”
- John Somerville, “Toward a Constant
Definition of Freedom and Its Relation to Value”
- Karl W. Deutsch, “Strategies of Freed=
om:
The Widening of Choices and the Change of Goals”
- Andrew Hacker, “Freedom and Power: Co=
mmon
Men and Uncommon Men”
Nomos V: The Public Interest (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1962<=
/span>
- Gerhart Niemeyer, “Public Interest and
Private Utility” <=
o:p>
- Ernest S. Griffith, “The Ethical Foun=
dation
of the Public Interest” <=
/span>
- William S. Minor, “Public Interest and
Ultimate Cmmitment”
- C. W. Cassinelli, “The Public Interes=
t in
Political Ethics” =
- Harold Lasswell, “The Public Interest:
Proposing Principles of Content and Procedure”
- Wolfgang Friedmann, “The Changing Con=
tent
of Public Interest”
- George Nakhnikian, “Common and Public
Interest Defined” =
- Stephen K. Bailey, “The Public Intere=
st:
Some Operational Dilemmas”
- Richard Musgrave, “The Public Interes=
t:
Efficiency in the Creation and Maintenance of Material Welfare”<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>
- Gerhard Colm, “The Public Interest:
Essential Key to Public Policy”=
- David V. Braybrooke, “The Public Inte=
rest:
The Present and Future of the Concept”
- Julius Cohen, “A Lawman’s View =
of the
Public Interest” <=
o:p>
- Glendon Schubert, “Is There A Public
Interest Theory?” =
- J. Roland Pennock, “The One and the M=
any: A
Note on the Concept”
- Frank J. Sorauf, “The Conceptual
Middle”
- Brian Barry, “The Use and Abuse of
‘The Public Interest’”
- Edgar Bodenheimer, “Prolegomena to a =
Theory
of the Public Interest” <=
/span>
- John D. Montgomery, “Public Interest =
and
the Ideologies of National Development”
- Wa=
yne Leys, “The Relevance and Generality =
of
‘The Public Interest’”
Nomos VI: Justice (eds. Carl J. Friedrich and John W. Chapman), 19=
63
- Frank H. Knight, “On the Meaning of
Justice”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Justice: The Just
Political Act”
- Richard McKeon, “Justice and
Equality”
- Ar=
nold Brecht, “The Ultimate Standard of
Justice”
- Joel Feinberg, “Justice and Personal Desert”
- John Rawls, “Constitutional Liberty and =
the
Concept of Justice”
- Charles Fried, “Justice and Liberty̶=
1;
- John W. Chapman, “Justice and
Fairness”
- Clarence Morris, “Law, Justice and the
Public’s Aspirations”
- Iredell Jenkins, “Justice as Ideal and
Ideology”
- David Granfield, “The Scholastic Disp=
ute on
Justice: Aquinas versus Ockham”
- Richard H. Cox, “Justice As the Basis=
of
the Political Order in Locke”
- Raymond Polin, “Justice in Locke̵=
7;s
Philosophy”
- Hugo A. Bedau, “Justice and Classical
Utilitarianism”
- Robert C. Tucker, “Marx and Distribut=
ive
Justice”
Nomos VII: Rational Decision (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1964<=
/p>
- Judith N. Shklar, “Decisionism”=
- William K. Frankena, “Decisionism and
Separatism in Social Philosophy”
- Heinz Eulau, “Logics of Rationality in
Unanimous Decision-Making”
- Abraham Kaplan, “Some Limits on
Rationality”
- Gottfried Dietze, “The Limited Ration=
ality
of Law”
- Mur=
ray L. Schwartz, “The Separation of Lega=
l and
Moral Decisions”
- J. Roland Pennock, “Reason in Legisla=
tive
Decisions”
- Paul A. Freund, “Rationality in Judic=
ial
Decisions”
- John Ladd, “The Place of Practical Re=
ason
in Judicial Decision”
- A.A. Mavrinac, “Political Privacy, the
Courts, and the Worlds of Reason and Life”
- Margaret Spahr, “When the Supreme Cou=
rt
Subordinates Judicial Reason to Legislation”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “On Rereading
Machiavelli and Althusius: Reason, Rationality, and Religion”
- Harvey C. Mansfield, “Rationality and
Representation in Burke’s ‘Bristol Speech’”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rational Decisio=
ns and
Intrinsic Valuations”
- Sir Isaiah Berlin,
“On the Rationality of Value Judgments”<=
/li>
- Charles E. Lindblom, “Some Limitation=
s on
Rationality: A Comment”
Nomos VIII: Revolution <=
span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>(ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1966<=
/p>
- Carl J. Friederich, “An Introductory =
Note
on Revolution”
- George Pettee, “Revolution: Typology =
and
Progress”
- Paul Schrecker, “Revolution as a Prob=
lem in
the Philosophy of History”
- David C. Rapoport, “Coup d’état: The View of the Men Firing
Pistols”
- Melvin Richter, “Tocqueville’s
Contributions to the Theory of Revolution”
- Eugene Kamenka, “The Concept of a Pol=
itical
Revolution”
- C.B. MacPherson, “Revolution and Ideo=
logy
in the Late Twentieth Century”
- Richard A. Falk, “World Revolution and
International Order”
- Manfred Halpern, “The Revolution of
Modernization in National and International Society”<=
/span>
- Robert C. Tucker, “The Marxian
Revolutionary Idea”
- David Braybrooke, “Marx on Revolution=
izing
the Mode of Production”
Nomos IX: Equality, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
67
- Hugo Adam Bedau, “Egalitarianism and =
the
Idea of Equality”
- Norman Dorsen, “A Lawyer’s Look=
at
Egalitarianism and Equality”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Equality and
Generalization, a Formal Analysis”
- Stanley
I. Benn, “Egalitarianism and the Equal Consideration of
Interests”
- John Plamenatz, “Diversity of Rights =
and
Kinds of Equality”
- George E.G. Catlin, “Equality and Wha=
t We
Mean By It”
- Sa=
nford A. Lakoff, “Christianity and
Equality”
- Paul E. Sigmund, “Hierarchy, Equality=
, and
Consent in Medieval Political Thought”
- Emanuel Rackman, “Judaism and
Equality”
- A.H. Somjee, “Individuality and Equal=
ity in
Hinduism”
- Herbert Spielberg, “Equality in
Existentialism”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “A Brief Discourse=
on
the Origin of Political Equality”
- John H. Schaar, “Equality of Opportunity, and Beyond”
- Mon=
roe H. Freedman, “Equality in the
Administration of Criminal Justice”
- Geoffrey Marshall, “Notes on the Rule=
of
Equal Law”
- D.D. Raphael, “Equality, Democracy, a=
nd
International Law”
- Robert W. Gregg, “Equality of States =
Within
the United Nations”
- Thomas M. Franck, “Equality and Inequ=
ality
of States in the United Nations”
Nomos X: Representation,=
eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman 196=
8
- J. Roland Pennock, ”Political
Representation: An Overview”
- B.J. Diggs, “Practical
Representation”
- Hanna Pitkin, “Commentary: The Parado=
x of
Representation”
- Julius Cohen, “Commentary: Representa=
tion
and the Problem of Identity”
- William K. Frankena, “Two Notes on
Representation”
- Harvey C. Manfield, Jr., “Modern and
Medieval Representation”
- Isaac Kramnick, “An Augustan Debate: =
Notes
on the History of the Idea of Representation”<=
/li>
- Marek Sobolewski, “Electors and
Representatives: A Contribution to the Theory of Representation”=
- Eric A. Nordlinger, “Representation,
Governmental Stability, and Decisional Effectiveness”=
- Charles L. Black, Jr., “Representatio=
n in
Law and Equity”
- Stuart M. Brown Jr., “Black on
Representation: A Question”
- Donald E. Stokes, “Political Parties =
in the
Normative Theory of Representation”
- Lewis A. Dexter, “Standards for
Representative Selection and Apportionment”
- Robert G. Dixon, Jr., “Representation
Values and Reapportionment Practice: The Eschatology of ‘One-Man,
One-Vote’”
- William H. Riker and Lloyd S. Shapley,
“Weighted Voting: A Mathematical Anaysis for Instrumental
Judgments”
- Robert Nozick, “Weighted Voting and
‘One-Man, One-Vote’”
- Joseph P. Witherspoon, “The Bureaucra=
cy as
Representatives”
- Witold Zakrzewski, “The Mechanism of =
Popular
Activity in the Exercise of State Authority in People’s Poland”
- David E. Apter, “Notes for a Theory of
Nondemocratic Representation”
Nomos XI: Voluntary Associations (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1=
969
- Lon L. Fuller, ”Two Principles of Hum=
an
Association”
- Abraham Edel, “Commentary: Shared
Commitment and the Legal Principle”
- Henry S. Kariel, “Commentary: Transce=
nding
Privcy”
- H.S. Harris, “Voluntary Association a=
s a
Rational Ideal”
- Willard Hurst, “Commentary: Constitut=
ional
Ideals and Private Associations”
- Leonard G. Boonin, “Man and Society: =
An
Examination of Three Models”
- John W. Chapman, “Voluntary Associati=
on and
the Political Theory of Pluralism”
- Maure L. oldschmidt, “Rousseau on
Intermediate Association”
- George Kateb, “Some Remarks on
Tocqueville’s View of Voluntary Associations”
- Grant McConnell, “The Public Values o=
f the
Private Association”
- David Sidorsky, “Commentary: Pluralis=
m,
Empiricism, and the Secondary Association”
- William Leon McBride, “Voluntary
Association: The Basis of an Ideal Model, and the ‘Democratic=
217;
Failure”
- Arthur Selwyn Miller, “The Constituti=
on and
the Voluntary Association: Some Notes Toward a Theory”
- Suzanne Berger, “Corporative Associat=
ion:
The Case of a French Rural Association”
Nomos XII: Political and Legal Obli=
gation, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
70
- John Ladd, “Legal and Moral
Obligation”
- Jeffrie G. Murphy, “In Defense of
Obligation”
- Mark MacGuigan, “Obligation and
Obedience”
- Alan Gewirth, “Obligation: Political,
Legal, Moral”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Obligations, Id=
eals,
and Ability”
- Kurt Baier, “Obligation: Political and
Moral”
- John W. Chapman, “The Moral Foundatio=
ns of
Political Obligation”
- Gray L. Dorsey, “Constitutional
Obligation”
- Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “On Feeling
Obligated to Do What a Constitution Requires”<=
/li>
- Stuart S. Nagel, “Causes and Effects =
of
Constitutional Compliance”
- David C. Rappaport, “Rome: Fides and Obsequiu=
m,
Rise and Fall”
- Nannerl O. Henry, “Political Obligati=
on and
Collective Goods”
- James Luther Adams, “Civil Disobedien=
ce:
Its Occasions and Limits”
- Kent Greenawalt, “A Contextual Approa=
ch to
Civil Disobedience”
- Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “Some Truth=
s and
Untruths About Civil Disobedience”
- Michael Walzer, “Political Alienation=
and
Military Service”
- Alfred G. Meyer, “Political Change th=
rough
Civil Disobedience in the USSR
and Eastern Europe”
- Wayne A.R. Leys and P.S.S. Rama Rao,
“Gandhi’s Synthesis of Indian Spirituality and Western
Politics”
Nomos XIII: Privacy (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 19=
71
- Stanl=
ey I. Benn, “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect=
for
Persons”
- W.L. Weinstein, “The Private and the =
Free:
A Conceptual Inquiry”
- Elizabeth L. Beardsley, “Privacy: Aut=
onomy
and Selective Disclosure”
- Arnold Simmel, “Privacy is Not an Iso=
lated
Freedom”
- Michael A. Weinstein, “The Uses of Pr=
ivacy
in the Good Life”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Secrecy vs.
Privacy,” The Democratic Dilemma”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Privacy in Compara=
tive
Perspective”
- Ernest van den Haag, “On Privacy̶=
1;
- Hyman Gross, “Privacy and Autonomy=
221;
- Paul A. Freund, “Privacy: One Concept=
or
Many”
- John M. Roberts and Thomas Gregor,
“Privacy: A Cultural View”
- John R. Silber, “Masks and Fig
Leaves”
- John W. Chapman, “Personality and
Privacy”
Nomos XIV: Coercion, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
72
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Coercion: an
Overview”
- Michael D. Bayles, “A Concept of
Coercion”
- Bernard Gert, “Coercion and Freedom&#=
8221;
- Virginia Held, “Coercion and Coercive
Offers”
- Michael A. Weinstein, “Coercion, Spac=
e, and
the Modes of Human Domination”
- Robert K. Faulkner, “Spontaneity, Jus=
tice,
and Coercion: On Nicomachean E=
thics,
Books III and V”
- Samuel DuBois Cook, “Coercion and Soc=
ial
Change”
- Robert Paul Wolff,. “Is Coercion
‘Ethically Neutral’?”
- J. Howard Sobel, “The Need for
Coercion”
- William Leon McBride, “Noncoercive So=
ciety:
Some Doubts, Leninist and Contemporary”
- William H. Riker, “Trust as an Altern=
ative
to Coercion”
- Alan P. Wertheimer, “Political Coerci=
on and
Political Obligation”
- Donald McIntosh, “Coercion and
International Politics: A Theoretical Analysis”
- Robert Jervis, “Bargaining and Bargai=
ning
Tactics”
- John W. Chapman, “Coercion in Politic=
s and
Strategy”
Nomos XV: The Limits of Law,=
eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
74
- David J. Danelski, “The Limits of
Law”
- William Leon McBride, “An Overview of=
Future
Possibilities: Law Unlimited?”
- Julius Cohen, “Perspectives on the Li=
mits
of Law”
- June Louin Tapp, “The Psychological L=
imits
of Legality”
- Kent Greenawalt, “Some Related Limits=
of
Law”
- Sergio Cotta, “Law Between Ethics and
Politics: A Phenomenological Approach”
- Michael W. Weinstein, “A Binary Theory of the Limits of
Law”
- Graham Hughes, “Social Justice and the
Courts”
- Alan Dershowitz, “Toward a Jurisprude=
nce of
‘Harm’ Prevention”
- Stephen L. Wasby, “Beyond Dershowitz:
Limits in Attempting to Secure Change”
- Martin P. Golding, “Is Civil Commitme=
nt a
Mistake?”
- Michael D. Bayles, “Criminal
Paternalism”
- Donald H. Regan, “Justifications for
Paternalism”
- Kenneth M. Dolbeare, “Law and Social
Consequences: Some Conceptual Problems and Alternatives”
- Jerome Hall, “Jurisprudential Theorie=
s and
the Effectiveness of Law”
- Hugo Adam Bedau, “Our Knowledge of
Law’s Limited Effectiveness”
- Victor G. Rosenblum, “Of Beneficiarie=
s and
Compliance”
Nomos XVI: Participation in Politic=
s (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1=
975
- Donald W. Keim, “Participation in
Contemporary Democratic Theories”
- Peter Bachrach, “Interest, Participat=
ion,
and Democratic Theory”
- David Braybrooke, “The Meaning of
Participation and the Demands For It: A Preliminary Survey of the
Conceptual Issues”
- George Kateb, “Comments on David
Braybrooke’s ‘The Meaning of Participation and the Demands=
For
It: A Preliminary Survey of the Conceptual Issues’”
- John Ladd, “The Ethics of
Participation”
- M.B.E. Smith, “The Value of
Participation”
- Samuel Mermin, “Participation in
Governmental Processes: A Sketch of the Expanding Law”
- Howard I. Kalodner, “Citizen Particip=
ation
in Emerging Social Institutions”
- Stephen Wexler, “Expert and Lay
Participation in Decision Making”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Participation Wit=
hout
Responsibility: Codetermination in Industry and University”=
- David G. Smith, “Professional
Responsibility and Political Participation”
- Lisa H. Newton, “The Community and the
Cattle-pen: An Analysis of Participation”
- Jane J. Mansbridge, “The Limits of
Friendship”
- Alan Wertheimer, “In Defense of Compu=
lsory
Voting”
Nomos XVII: Human Nature in Politic=
s, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
77
- Peter A. Corning, “Human Nature Redivivus”
- Roger D. Masters, “Human Nature, Natu=
re,
and Political Thought”
- George Armstrong Kelly, “Politics,
Violence, and Human Nature”
- Lisa H. Newton, “The Political
Animal”
- James Chowning Davies, “The Priority =
of
Human Needs and the Stages of Human Development”
- Donald W. Keim, “To Make All Things
New”—The Counterculture Vision of Man and Politics
- Marvin Zetterbaum, “Human Nature and
History”
- Lyman Tower Sargent, “Human Nature and the Radic=
al
Vision”
- Richard Brandt, “The Concept of Ratio=
nality
in Ethical and Political Theory”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rationality and
Egalitarianism”
- Bernard Gert, “Irrational DesiresR=
21;
- John W. Chapman, “Toward a General Th=
eory
of Human Nature and Dynamics”
Nomos XVIII: Due Process, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
77
- Charles A. Mills, “The Forest of Due =
Process
of Law: The American Constitutional Tradition”
- Gerald Kramer, “Some Procedural Aspec=
ts of
Majority Rule”
- Geoffrey Marshall, “Due Process in England”
- T.M. Scanlon, “Due Process”
- Frank Michelman, “Formal and Associat=
ional
Aims in Due Process”
- Edmund Pincoffs, “Due Process, Frater=
nity,
and the Kantian Injunction”&nbs=
p;
- Thomas C. Grey, “Procedural Fairness =
and
Substantive Rights”
- David Resnick, “Due Process and Proce=
dural
Justice”
- Thomas Kearns, “On De-Moralizing Due
Process”
- David J. Danielski, “Due Process in a
Nonlegal Setting: An Ombudsman’s Experience”
- Arthur Kuflick, “Majority Rule
Procedure”
- Richard Epstein, “Voting Theory, Union
Elections, and the Constitution”
Nomos XIX: Anarchism (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 19=
78
- Gerald F. Gaus and John W. Chapman,
“Anarchism and Political Philosophy: An Introduction”=
- John P. Clark, “What Is Anarchism?=
221;
- James M. Buchanan, “A Contractarian
Perspective on Anarchy”
- Eric Mack, “Nozick’s Anarchism&=
#8221;
- Richard A. Falk, “Anarchism and World
Order”
- Richard T. De George, “Anarchism and
Authority”
- Richard Wasserstrom, “Comments on
‘Anarchism and Authority’”
- Rex Martin, “Anarchism and
Skepticism”
- Alan Ritter, “The Anarchist Justifica=
tion
of Authority”
- Lester J. Mazor, “Disrespect for Law&=
#8221;
- Lisa Newton, “The Profoundest Respect=
for
Law: Mazor’s Anarchy and the Political Association”
- Alan Wertheimer, “Disrespect for Law =
and
the Case for Anarchy”
- Murray<=
span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'> N. Rothbard,
“Society Without a State”
- Christopher D. Stone, “Some Reflectio=
n on
Arbitrating Our Way to Anarchy”
- David Wieck, “Anarchist Justice”=
;
- Donald McIntosh, “The Dimensions of
Anarchy”
- Grenville Wall, “Philosophical Anarch=
ism
Revisited”
- Patrick Riley, “On the
‘Kantian’ Foundation of Robert Paul Wolff’s
Anarchism”
- April Carter, “Anarchism and
Violence”
Nomos XX: Constitutionalism,=
eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
79
- Gordon J. Shochet, “Introduction:
Constitutionalism, Liberalism, and the Study of Politics”
- Dante Germino, “Carl J. Friedrich on
Constitutionalism and the ‘Great Tradition’ of Political
Theory”
- Paul Sigmund, “Carl Friedrich’s
Contribution to the Theory of Constitutionalism- Comparative
Government”
- Nannerl O. Keohane, “Claude de Seysse=
l and
Sixteenth-Century Constitutionalism in France”=
- Cecelia M. Kenyon, “Constitutionalism=
in
Revolutionary A=
merica”
- Wilfrid E. Rumble, “James Madison on =
the
Value of Bills of Rights”
- Christopher C. Mojekwu, “Nigerian
Constitutionalism”
- Thomas C. Grey, “Constitutionalism: An
Analytic Framework”
- William J. Bennett, “A Comment on Cec=
elia
Kenyon’s ‘Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America”=
;
- George Kateb, “Remarks on the Procedu=
res of
Constitutional Democracy”
- Ronald Moore, “Rawls on
Constitution-Making”
- Richard B. Parker, “The Jurisprudenti=
al
Uses of John Rawls”
- George P. Fletcher, “The Separation of
Powers: A Critique of Some Utilitarian Justifications”
- Stephanie R. Lewis, “Comments on Geor=
ge P.
Fletcher’s “The Separation of Powers: Critique of Some
Utilitarian Justifications”
- Arthur S. Miller, “Judicial Activism =
and
American Constitutionalism: Some Notes and Reflections”
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Epilogue”
Nomos XXI: Compromise in Ethics, La=
w, and
Politics, eds., J. Roland Penno=
ck and
John W. Chapman, 1979
- Martin P. Golding, “The Nature of
Compromise: A Preliminary Inquiry”
- Theodore M. Benditt, “Compromising
Interests and Principles”
- Arthur Kuflik, “Morality and
Compromise”
- David Resnick, “Justice, Compromise, =
and
Constitutional Rules in Aristotle’s Politics”
- George Armstrong Kelly, “Mediation Ve=
rsus
Compromise in Hegel”
- Paul Thomas, “Marxism and Compromise:=
A
Speculation”
- Joseph H. Carens, “Compromise in
Politics”
- Edgard Bodenheimer, “Compromise in the
Realization of Ideas and Values”
- Martin Shapiro, “Compromise and
Litigation”
- Aleksander Peczenik, “Cumulation and
Compromise of Reasons in the Law”
- John E. Coons, “Compromise as Precise
Justice”
Nomos XXII: Property, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 19=
80
- Kenneth R. Minogue, “The Concept of
Property and Its Contemporary Significance”
- Charles Donahue, Jr., “The Future of =
the
Concept of Property Predicted From Its Past”
- Thomas C. Grey, “The Distintegration =
of
Property”
- Christopher J. Berry, “Property and
Possession: Two Replies to Locke—Hume and Hegel”
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Property As Art=
ifice:
Hume and Blackstone”
- Peter G. Stillman, “Property, Freedom=
, and
Individuality in Marx’s Political Thought”
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Thoughts on the R=
ight
to Private Property”
- Law=
rence C. Becker, “The Moral Basis of Prope=
rty
Rights”
- Richard E. Flathman, “On the Alleged
Impossibility of an Unqualified Disjustificatory Theory of Property Ri=
ghts”
- Hillel Steiner, “Slavery, Socialism, =
and
Private Property”
- Jean Baechler, “Liberty, Property, and Equality=
221;
- John W. Chapman, “Justice, Freedom, a=
nd
Property”
- Duncan MacRae, Jr., “Scientific
Policymaking and Compensation for the Taking of Property”
- T.M. Scanlon, “Comments on Ackerman&#=
8217;s
Private Property and the
Constiution”
- Bruce A. Ackerman, “Four Questions for
Legal Theory”
- La=
wrence G. Sager, “Property Rights and the
Constitution”
Nomos XXIII: Human Rights (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 19=
81
- J. Roland Pennock, “Rights, Natural R=
ights,
and Human Rights—A General View”
- John Charvet, “A Critique of Human
Rights”
- Frithjof Bergmann, “Two Critiques of =
the
Traditional Theory of Human Rights”
- Anthony T. Kronman, “Talent Pooling&#=
8221;
- John Gray, “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Uti=
lity,
and Rights”
- Alan Gewirth, “The Basis and Content =
of
Human Rights”
- Richard B. Friedman, “The Basis of Hu=
man
Rights: A Criticism of Gewirth’s Theory
- Arval A. Morris, “A Differential Theo=
ry of
Human Rights”
- Martin P. Golding, “From Prudence to
Rights: A Critique”
- Jan Narveson, “Human Rights: Which, i=
f Any,
Are There?”
- Kurt Baier, “When Does the Right to L=
ife
Begin?
- Susan Moller Okin, “Liberty and Welfare: Some Issues in
Human Rights Theory”
- Louis Henkin, “International Human Ri=
ghts
as ‘Rights’”
- William N. Nelson, “Human Rights and =
Human
Obligations”
Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics, and =
the
Law (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1982
- Frank I. Michelman, ”Ethics, Economic=
s, and
the Law of Property”
- Harold Demsetz, “Professor
Michelman’s Unnecessary and Futile Search for the
Philosopher’s Touchstone”
- Richard A. Epstein, “Private Property=
and
the Public Domain: The Case of Antitrust”
- Jules L. Coleman, “The Economic Analy=
sis of
Law”
- David Lyons, “Utility and Rights̶=
1;
- Kent Greenawalt, “Utilitarian
Justifications for Observance of Legal Rights”=
- R.M. Hare, “Utility and Rights: Comme=
nt on
David Lyons’s Essay”
- Alan Gewirth, “Can Utilitarianism Jus=
tify
Any Moral Rights?”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Rights, Utility=
, and
Civil Disobedience”
- George P. Fletcher, “Utility and
Skepticism”
- Brian Barry, “Utility and Justice in =
Global
Perspective”
- Kai Nielsen, “On the Need to Politici=
ze
Political Morality: World Hunger and Moral Obligation”
- Thomas M. Franck, “Political Function=
alism
and Philosophical Imperatives in the Fight for a New Economic Order=
221;
- David A.J. Richards., “International
Distributive Justice”
- Harry N. Scheiber, “Law and the Imper=
atives
of Progress: Private Rights and Public Values in American Legal
History”
Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy,
eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Prologue: Democ=
ratic
Theory and the Boundary Problem”
- Stepehen L. Darwall, “Equal
Representation”
- Charles R. Beitz, “Procedural Equalit=
y in
Democratic Theory: A Preliminary Examination”<=
/li>
- Robert A. Dahl, “Federalism and the
Democratic Process”
- David Braybrooke, “Can Democracy Be
Combined with Federalism or with Liberalism?”<=
/li>
- Robert B. McKay, “Judicial Review in a
Liberal Democracy”
- George Kateb, “Remarks on Robert B. M=
cKay,
‘Judicial Review in a Liberal Democracy’”=
- Peter Railton, “Judicial Review, Elit=
es,
and Liberal Democracy”
- Robert F. Nagel, “Interpretation and
Importance in Constitutional Law: A Re-assessment of Judicial
Restraint”
- David G. Smith, “Liberalism and Judic=
ial
Review”
- Frederick Schauer, “Free Speech and t=
he
Argument From Democracy”
- Amy Gutmann, “Is Freedom Academic? The Relative Autonomy of
Universities in a Liberal Democracy”
- Barry Holden, “Liberal Democracy and =
the
Social Determination of Ideas”
- Kenneth I. Winston, “Toward a Liberal
Conception of Legislation”
- William C. Mitchell, “Efficiency,
Responsibility, and Democratic Politics”
- =
Robert E.
Lane,
“Individualism and the Market Society”
- J. Roland Pennock, “Epilogue: Some
Perplexities Further Considered”
Nomos
XXVI: Marxism (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)
- Richard W. Miller, “Marx and
Morality”
- Patrick Riley, “Marx and Morality: A =
Reply
to Richard Miller”
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Marx and
Revolutionary Virtue”
- Sheldon S. Wolin, “On Reading Marx
Politically”
- Stephen Holmes, “On Reading Marx
Apolitically”
- Alan Gilbert, “The Storming of Heaven:
Politics and Marx’s Capi=
tal”
- Mark Tushnet, “Is There a Marxist The=
ory of
Law?”
- Leon Lipson, “Is There a Marxist Theo=
ry of
Law? Comments on Tushnet”
- Tom Gerety, “Iron Law: Why Good Lawye=
rs
Make Bad Marxists”
- G. A. Cohen, “Reconsidering Historical
Materialism”
- Peter G. Stillman, “Marx’s Ente=
rprise
of Critique”
- Jon Elster, “Exploitation, Freedom, a=
nd
Justice”
Nomos XXVII: Criminal Justice (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)<=
o:p>