Fifty Years of Nomos

 

The Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy

 

 

General Editors of Nomos:

Carl J. Friederich, volumes I-IX

J. Roland Pennock, IX-XXXI, and John W. Chapman, volumes IX- XXXV

Ian Shapiro, volumes XXXV- XLII

Stephen Macedo, volumes XLII-XLVI

Melissa S. Williams, volumes XLVI-

 

 

 Nomos I: Authority  (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1958

 

• Charles W. Hendel, “An Exploration of the Nature of Authority”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “Authority, Reason, and Discretion”
• Herbert J. Spiro, “Authority, Values, and Policy” 
• Jerome Hall, “Authority and the Law” 
• Frank H. Knight, “Authority and the Free Society”
• Hannah Arendt, “What Was Authority?”
• Norman Jacobson, “Knowledge, Tradition, and Authority: A Note on the American Experience” 
• George E. Gordon Caitlin, “Authority and Its Critics”
• Wolfgang H. Kraus, “Authority, Progress, and Colonialism”
• Bertrand de Jouvenal, “Authority: The Efficient Imperative” 
• David Easton, “The Perception of Authority and Social Change” 
• Talcott Parsons, “Authority, Legitimation, and Political Action” 
• E. Adamson Hoebel, “Authority in Primitive Societies” 

 

 Nomos II: Community  (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1959

 

• Carl J. Friedrich, “The Concept of Community in Political and Legal Philosophy”
• Huntington Cairns, “The Community as the Legal Order” 
• Stuart M. Brown, Jr., “The Community as the Legal Order Reviewed” 
• William Y. Elliot, “The Co-Organic Concept of Community Applied to Legal Analysis: Constitutional and Totalitarian Regimes Compared” 
• Dante Germino, “The Crisis in Community: Challenge to Political Theory” 
• Jacob Taubes, “Communitu—After the Apocalypse” 
• George E. Gordon Caitlin, “The Meaning of Community”
• Benjamin Nelson, “Community—Dreams and Realities” 
• Talcott Parsons, “The Principle Structures of Community: A Sociological View”
• Thomas A. Cowan, “The Principle Structure of Community Reviewed” 
• Warren Roberts, “Community as Matrix” 
• Herbert W. Schneider, “Community, Communication, and Communion” 
• Wolfgang H. Kraus, “The Democratic Community and the Problem of Publicity” 
• Lon Fuller, “Governmental Secrecy and the Forms of Social Order” 
• John Ladd, “The Concept of Community: A Logical Analysis” 

 

 Nomos III: Responsibility (ed. Carl J. Friedrich),  1960

 

• J. Roland Pennock, “The Problem of Responsibility”
• Ludwig Freund, “Responsibility—Definitions, Distinctions, and Applications in Various Contexts” 
• George A. Schrader, “Responsibility and Existence” 
• Margaret Spahr, “The Role of the Supreme Court in the Integration of the American Community” 
• Wayne A. Leys, “Platonic, Pragmatic, and Political Responsibility” 
• Edgar Bodenheimer, “Is Punishment Obsolete?” 
• Richard B. Brandt, “The Conditions of Criminal Responsibility” 
• Henry Weihofen, “Retribution is Obsolete” 
• K.J. Newman, “Punishment and the Breakdown of the Legal Order: The Experience in East Pakistan” 
• Thomas E. Davitt, “Criminal Responsibility and Punishment” 
• Joel Feinberg, “On Justifying Legal Punishment”
• Frank H. Knight, “”Political Responsibility in a Democracy”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “The Dilemma of Administrative Responsibility”
• Warren Roberts, “Reflections on Administration Integrity” 
• John W. Chapman, “Metropolitan Citizenship: Promises and Limitations” 
• Arnold S. Kaufman, “Human Nature and Participatory Democracy” 
• Herbert J. Spiro, “Responsibility and the Goal of Survival” 
• John Austin, “Three Ways of Spilling Ink”

 

 

 Nomos IV: Liberty (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1962

 

• Leonard Krieger, “Stages in the History of Political Freedom”
• I. Fetscher, “Rousseau’s Concepts of Freedom in Light of His Philosophy of History”
• Albert A. Mavrinac, “Freedom, Authority, Conscience, and Development: Mill, Acton, and Some Contemporary Catholic Thinkers”
• William Ebenstein, “John Stuart Mill: Political and Economic Liberty”
• Frank H. Knight, “Some Notes on Political Freedom and On a Famous Essay”
• Henry D. Aiken, “Mill and the Justification of Social Freedom”
• Elizabeth F. Flower, “Mill and Some Present Concerns About Ethical Judgments”
• Margaret Spahr, “Mill on Paternalism In Its Place”
• David Spitz, “Freedom and Individuality: Mil’s Liberty in Retrospect”
• Harry W. Jones, “Freedom and Opportunity as Competing Social Values: Mill’s Liberty and Ours”
• Arnold Brecht, “Liberty and Truth: The Responsibility of Science”
• Mark DeWolfe Howe, “Problems of Religious Liberty”
• Felix E. Oppenheim, “Freedom—an Empirical Interpretation”
• John Somerville, “Toward a Constant Definition of Freedom and Its Relation to Value”
• Karl W. Deutsch, “Strategies of Freedom: The Widening of Choices and the Change of Goals”
• Andrew Hacker, “Freedom and Power: Common Men and Uncommon Men”

 Nomos V: The Public Interest (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1962

• Gerhart Niemeyer, “Public Interest and Private Utility” 
• Ernest S. Griffith, “The Ethical Foundation of the Public Interest” 
• William S. Minor, “Public Interest and Ultimate Cmmitment” 
• C. W. Cassinelli, “The Public Interest in Political Ethics” 
• Harold Lasswell, “The Public Interest: Proposing Principles of Content and Procedure”
• Wolfgang Friedmann, “The Changing Content of Public Interest”
• George Nakhnikian, “Common and Public Interest Defined” 
• Stephen K. Bailey, “The Public Interest: Some Operational Dilemmas” 
• Richard Musgrave, “The Public Interest: Efficiency in the Creation and Maintenance of Material Welfare” 
• Gerhard Colm, “The Public Interest: Essential Key to Public Policy” 
• David V. Braybrooke, “The Public Interest: The Present and Future of the Concept” 
• Julius Cohen, “A Lawman’s View of the Public Interest” 
• Glendon Schubert, “Is There A Public Interest Theory?” 
• J. Roland Pennock, “The One and the Many: A Note on the Concept” 
• Frank J. Sorauf, “The Conceptual Middle”
• Brian Barry, “The Use and Abuse of ‘The Public Interest’”
• Edgar Bodenheimer, “Prolegomena to a Theory of the Public Interest” 
• John D. Montgomery, “Public Interest and the Ideologies of National Development” 
• Wayne Leys, “The Relevance and Generality of ‘The Public Interest’” 

 

 Nomos VI: Justice (eds. Carl J. Friedrich and John W. Chapman), 1963

 

• Frank H. Knight, “On the Meaning of Justice”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “Justice: The Just Political Act”
• Richard McKeon, “Justice and Equality”
• Arnold Brecht, “The Ultimate Standard of Justice”
• Joel Feinberg, “Justice and Personal Desert”
• John Rawls, “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice”
• Charles Fried, “Justice and Liberty”
• John W. Chapman, “Justice and Fairness”
• Clarence Morris, “Law, Justice and the Public’s Aspirations”
• Iredell Jenkins, “Justice as Ideal and Ideology”
• David Granfield, “The Scholastic Dispute on Justice: Aquinas versus Ockham”
• Richard H. Cox, “Justice As the Basis of the Political Order in Locke”
• Raymond Polin, “Justice in Locke’s Philosophy”
• Hugo A. Bedau, “Justice and Classical Utilitarianism”
• Robert C. Tucker, “Marx and Distributive Justice”

 

 Nomos VII: Rational Decision (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1964

 

• Judith N. Shklar, “Decisionism”
• William K. Frankena, “Decisionism and Separatism in Social Philosophy”
• Heinz Eulau, “Logics of Rationality in Unanimous Decision-Making”
• Abraham Kaplan, “Some Limits on Rationality”
• Gottfried Dietze, “The Limited Rationality of Law”
• Murray L. Schwartz, “The Separation of Legal and Moral Decisions”
• J. Roland Pennock, “Reason in Legislative Decisions”
• Paul A. Freund, “Rationality in Judicial Decisions”
• John Ladd, “The Place of Practical Reason in Judicial Decision”
• A.A. Mavrinac, “Political Privacy, the Courts, and the Worlds of Reason and Life”
• Margaret Spahr, “When the Supreme Court Subordinates Judicial Reason to Legislation”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “On Rereading Machiavelli and Althusius: Reason, Rationality, and Religion”
• Harvey C. Mansfield, “Rationality and Representation in Burke’s ‘Bristol Speech’”
• Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rational Decisions and Intrinsic Valuations”
• Sir Isaiah Berlin, “On the Rationality of Value Judgments”
• Charles E. Lindblom, “Some Limitations on Rationality: A Comment”

 Nomos VIII: Revolution (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1966

 

• Carl J. Friederich, “An Introductory Note on Revolution”
• George Pettee, “Revolution: Typology and Progress”
• Paul Schrecker, “Revolution as a Problem in the Philosophy of History”
• David C. Rapoport, “Coup d’état: The View of the Men Firing Pistols”
• Melvin Richter, “Tocqueville’s Contributions to the Theory of Revolution”
• Eugene Kamenka, “The Concept of a Political Revolution”
• C.B. MacPherson, “Revolution and Ideology in the Late Twentieth Century”
• Richard A. Falk, “World Revolution and International Order”
• Manfred Halpern, “The Revolution of Modernization in National and International Society”
• Robert C. Tucker, “The Marxian Revolutionary Idea”
• David Braybrooke, “Marx on Revolutionizing the Mode of Production”

 Nomos IX: Equality, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1967

 

• Hugo Adam Bedau, “Egalitarianism and the Idea of Equality”
• Norman Dorsen, “A Lawyer’s Look at Egalitarianism and Equality”
• Richard E. Flathman, “Equality and Generalization, a Formal Analysis”
• Stanley I. Benn, “Egalitarianism and the Equal Consideration of Interests”
• John Plamenatz, “Diversity of Rights and Kinds of Equality”
• George E.G. Catlin, “Equality and What We Mean By It”
• Sanford A. Lakoff, “Christianity and Equality”
• Paul E. Sigmund, “Hierarchy, Equality, and Consent in Medieval Political Thought”
• Emanuel Rackman, “Judaism and Equality”
• A.H. Somjee, “Individuality and Equality in Hinduism”
• Herbert Spielberg, “Equality in Existentialism”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “A Brief Discourse on the Origin of Political Equality”
• John H. Schaar, “Equality of Opportunity, and Beyond”
• Monroe H. Freedman, “Equality in the Administration of Criminal Justice”
• Geoffrey Marshall, “Notes on the Rule of Equal Law”
• D.D. Raphael, “Equality, Democracy, and International Law”
• Robert W. Gregg, “Equality of States Within the United Nations”
• Thomas M. Franck, “Equality and Inequality of States in the United Nations”

 

 Nomos X: Representation, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman 1968

 

• J. Roland Pennock, ”Political Representation: An Overview”
• B.J. Diggs, “Practical Representation”
• Hanna Pitkin, “Commentary: The Paradox of Representation”
• Julius Cohen, “Commentary: Representation and the Problem of Identity”
• William K. Frankena, “Two Notes on Representation”
• Harvey C. Manfield, Jr., “Modern and Medieval Representation”
• Isaac Kramnick, “An Augustan Debate: Notes on the History of the Idea of Representation”
• Marek Sobolewski, “Electors and Representatives: A Contribution to the Theory of Representation”
• Eric A. Nordlinger, “Representation, Governmental Stability, and Decisional Effectiveness”
• Charles L. Black, Jr., “Representation in Law and Equity”
• Stuart M. Brown Jr., “Black on Representation: A Question”
• Donald E. Stokes, “Political Parties in the Normative Theory of Representation”
• Lewis A. Dexter, “Standards for Representative Selection and Apportionment”
• Robert G. Dixon, Jr., “Representation Values and Reapportionment Practice: The Eschatology of ‘One-Man, One-Vote’”
• William H. Riker and Lloyd S. Shapley, “Weighted Voting: A Mathematical Anaysis for Instrumental Judgments”
• Robert Nozick, “Weighted Voting and ‘One-Man, One-Vote’”
• Joseph P. Witherspoon, “The Bureaucracy as Representatives”
• Witold Zakrzewski, “The Mechanism of Popular Activity in the Exercise of State Authority in People’s Poland”
• David E. Apter, “Notes for a Theory of Nondemocratic Representation”

 Nomos XI: Voluntary Associations (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1969

 

• Lon L. Fuller, ”Two Principles of Human Association”
• Abraham Edel, “Commentary: Shared Commitment and the Legal Principle”
• Henry S. Kariel, “Commentary: Transcending Privcy”
• H.S. Harris, “Voluntary Association as a Rational Ideal”
• Willard Hurst, “Commentary: Constitutional Ideals and Private Associations”
• Leonard G. Boonin, “Man and Society: An Examination of Three Models”
• John W. Chapman, “Voluntary Association and the Political Theory of Pluralism”
• Maure L. oldschmidt, “Rousseau on Intermediate Association”
• George Kateb, “Some Remarks on Tocqueville’s View of Voluntary Associations”
• Grant McConnell, “The Public Values of the Private Association”
• David Sidorsky, “Commentary: Pluralism, Empiricism, and the Secondary Association”
• William Leon McBride, “Voluntary Association: The Basis of an Ideal Model, and the ‘Democratic’ Failure”
• Arthur Selwyn Miller, “The Constitution and the Voluntary Association: Some Notes Toward a Theory”
• Suzanne Berger, “Corporative Association: The Case of a French Rural Association”

 

 Nomos XII: Political and Legal Obligation, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1970

 

• John Ladd, “Legal and Moral Obligation”
• Jeffrie G. Murphy, “In Defense of Obligation”
• Mark MacGuigan, “Obligation and Obedience”
• Alan Gewirth, “Obligation: Political, Legal, Moral”
• Richard E. Flathman, “Obligations, Ideals, and Ability”
• Kurt Baier, “Obligation: Political and Moral”
• John W. Chapman, “The Moral Foundations of Political Obligation”
• Gray L. Dorsey, “Constitutional Obligation”
• Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “On Feeling Obligated to Do What a Constitution Requires”
• Stuart S. Nagel, “Causes and Effects of Constitutional Compliance”
• David C. Rappaport, “Rome: Fides and Obsequium, Rise and Fall”
• Nannerl O. Henry, “Political Obligation and Collective Goods”
• James Luther Adams, “Civil Disobedience: Its Occasions and Limits”
• Kent Greenawalt, “A Contextual Approach to Civil Disobedience”
• Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “Some Truths and Untruths About Civil Disobedience”
• Michael Walzer, “Political Alienation and Military Service”
• Alfred G. Meyer, “Political Change through Civil Disobedience in the USSR and Eastern Europe”
• Wayne A.R. Leys and P.S.S. Rama Rao, “Gandhi’s Synthesis of Indian Spirituality and Western Politics”

 Nomos XIII: Privacy (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1971

 

• Stanley I. Benn, “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Persons”
• W.L. Weinstein, “The Private and the Free: A Conceptual Inquiry”
• Elizabeth L. Beardsley, “Privacy: Autonomy and Selective Disclosure”
• Arnold Simmel, “Privacy is Not an Isolated Freedom”
• Michael A. Weinstein, “The Uses of Privacy in the Good Life”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “Secrecy vs. Privacy,” The Democratic Dilemma”
• Herbert J. Spiro, “Privacy in Comparative Perspective”
• Ernest van den Haag, “On Privacy”
• Hyman Gross, “Privacy and Autonomy”
• Paul A. Freund, “Privacy: One Concept or Many”
• John M. Roberts and Thomas Gregor, “Privacy: A Cultural View”
• John R. Silber, “Masks and Fig Leaves”
• John W. Chapman, “Personality and Privacy”

 

 Nomos XIV: Coercion, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1972

 

• J. Ronald Pennock, “Coercion: an Overview”
• Michael D. Bayles, “A Concept of Coercion”
• Bernard Gert, “Coercion and Freedom”
• Virginia Held, “Coercion and Coercive Offers”
• Michael A. Weinstein, “Coercion, Space, and the Modes of Human Domination”
• Robert K. Faulkner, “Spontaneity, Justice, and Coercion: On Nicomachean Ethics, Books III and V”
• Samuel DuBois Cook, “Coercion and Social Change”
• Robert Paul Wolff,. “Is Coercion ‘Ethically Neutral’?”
• J. Howard Sobel, “The Need for Coercion”
• William Leon McBride, “Noncoercive Society: Some Doubts, Leninist and Contemporary”
• William H. Riker, “Trust as an Alternative to Coercion”
• Alan P. Wertheimer, “Political Coercion and Political Obligation”
• Donald McIntosh, “Coercion and International Politics: A Theoretical Analysis”
• Robert Jervis, “Bargaining and Bargaining Tactics”
• John W. Chapman, “Coercion in Politics and Strategy”

 Nomos XV: The Limits of Law, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1974

 

• David J. Danelski, “The Limits of Law”
• William Leon McBride, “An Overview of Future Possibilities: Law Unlimited?”
• Julius Cohen, “Perspectives on the Limits of Law”
• June Louin Tapp, “The Psychological Limits of Legality”
• Kent Greenawalt, “Some Related Limits of Law”
• Sergio Cotta, “Law Between Ethics and Politics: A Phenomenological Approach”
• Michael W. Weinstein, “A  Binary Theory of the Limits of Law”
• Graham Hughes, “Social Justice and the Courts”
• Alan Dershowitz, “Toward a Jurisprudence of ‘Harm’ Prevention”
• Stephen L. Wasby, “Beyond Dershowitz: Limits in Attempting to Secure Change”
• Martin P. Golding, “Is Civil Commitment a Mistake?”
• Michael D. Bayles, “Criminal Paternalism”
• Donald H. Regan, “Justifications for Paternalism”
• Kenneth M. Dolbeare, “Law and Social Consequences: Some Conceptual Problems and Alternatives”
• Jerome Hall, “Jurisprudential Theories and the Effectiveness of Law”
• Hugo Adam Bedau, “Our Knowledge of Law’s Limited Effectiveness”
• Victor G. Rosenblum, “Of Beneficiaries and Compliance”

 

 Nomos XVI: Participation in Politics (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1975

 

• Donald W. Keim, “Participation in Contemporary Democratic Theories”
• Peter Bachrach, “Interest, Participation, and Democratic Theory”
• David Braybrooke, “The Meaning of Participation and the Demands For It: A Preliminary Survey of the Conceptual Issues”
• George Kateb, “Comments on David Braybrooke’s ‘The Meaning of Participation and the Demands For It: A Preliminary Survey of the Conceptual Issues’”
• John Ladd, “The Ethics of Participation”
• M.B.E. Smith, “The Value of Participation”
• Samuel Mermin, “Participation in Governmental Processes: A Sketch of the Expanding Law”
• Howard I. Kalodner, “Citizen Participation in Emerging Social Institutions”
• Stephen Wexler, “Expert and Lay Participation in Decision Making”
• Carl J. Friedrich, “Participation Without Responsibility: Codetermination in Industry and University”
• David G. Smith, “Professional Responsibility and Political Participation”
• Lisa H. Newton, “The Community and the Cattle-pen: An Analysis of Participation”
• Jane J. Mansbridge, “The Limits of Friendship”
• Alan Wertheimer, “In Defense of Compulsory Voting”

 

 Nomos XVII: Human Nature in Politics, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1977

 

• Peter A. Corning, “Human Nature Redivivus”
• Roger D. Masters, “Human Nature, Nature, and Political Thought”
• George Armstrong Kelly, “Politics, Violence, and Human Nature”
• Lisa H. Newton, “The Political Animal”
• James Chowning Davies, “The Priority of Human Needs and the Stages of Human Development”
• Donald W. Keim, “To Make All Things New”—The Counterculture Vision of Man and Politics
• Marvin Zetterbaum, “Human Nature and History”
• Lyman Tower Sargent, “Human Nature and the Radical Vision”
• Richard Brandt, “The Concept of Rationality in Ethical and Political Theory”
• Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rationality and Egalitarianism”
• Bernard Gert, “Irrational Desires”
• John W. Chapman, “Toward a General Theory of Human Nature and Dynamics”

 

 Nomos XVIII: Due Process, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1977

 

• Charles A. Mills, “The Forest of Due Process of Law: The American Constitutional Tradition” 
• Gerald Kramer, “Some Procedural Aspects of Majority Rule” 
• Geoffrey Marshall, “Due Process in England” 
• T.M. Scanlon, “Due Process” 
• Frank Michelman, “Formal and Associational Aims in Due Process” 
• Edmund Pincoffs, “Due Process, Fraternity, and the Kantian Injunction” 
• Thomas C. Grey, “Procedural Fairness and Substantive Rights” 
• David Resnick, “Due Process and Procedural Justice” 
• Thomas Kearns, “On De-Moralizing Due Process” 
• David J. Danielski, “Due Process in a Nonlegal Setting: An Ombudsman’s Experience” 
• Arthur Kuflick, “Majority Rule Procedure” 
• Richard Epstein, “Voting Theory, Union Elections, and the Constitution” 

 Nomos XIX: Anarchism (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1978

 

• Gerald F. Gaus and John W. Chapman, “Anarchism and Political Philosophy: An Introduction”
• John P. Clark, “What Is Anarchism?”
• James M. Buchanan, “A Contractarian Perspective on Anarchy”
• Eric Mack, “Nozick’s Anarchism”
• Richard A. Falk, “Anarchism and World Order”
• Richard T. De George, “Anarchism and Authority”
• Richard Wasserstrom, “Comments on ‘Anarchism and Authority’”
• Rex Martin, “Anarchism and Skepticism”
• Alan Ritter, “The Anarchist Justification of Authority”
• Lester J. Mazor, “Disrespect for Law”
• Lisa Newton, “The Profoundest Respect for Law: Mazor’s Anarchy and the Political Association”
• Alan Wertheimer, “Disrespect for Law and the Case for Anarchy”
• Murray N. Rothbard, “Society Without a State”
• Christopher D. Stone, “Some Reflection on Arbitrating Our Way to Anarchy”
• David Wieck, “Anarchist Justice”
• Donald McIntosh, “The Dimensions of Anarchy”
• Grenville Wall, “Philosophical Anarchism Revisited”
• Patrick Riley, “On the ‘Kantian’ Foundation of Robert Paul Wolff’s Anarchism”
• April Carter, “Anarchism and Violence”

 

 

 Nomos XX: Constitutionalism, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1979

 

• Gordon J. Shochet, “Introduction: Constitutionalism, Liberalism, and the Study of Politics”
• Dante Germino, “Carl J. Friedrich on Constitutionalism and the ‘Great Tradition’ of Political Theory”
• Paul Sigmund, “Carl Friedrich’s Contribution to the Theory of Constitutionalism- Comparative Government”
• Nannerl O. Keohane, “Claude de Seyssel and Sixteenth-Century Constitutionalism in France”
• Cecelia M. Kenyon, “Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America”
• Wilfrid E. Rumble, “James Madison on the Value of Bills of Rights”
• Christopher C. Mojekwu, “Nigerian Constitutionalism”
• Thomas C. Grey, “Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework”
• William J. Bennett, “A Comment on Cecelia Kenyon’s ‘Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America”
• George Kateb, “Remarks on the Procedures of Constitutional Democracy”
• Ronald Moore, “Rawls on Constitution-Making”
• Richard B. Parker, “The Jurisprudential Uses of John Rawls”
• George P. Fletcher, “The Separation of Powers: A Critique of Some Utilitarian Justifications”
• Stephanie R. Lewis, “Comments on George P. Fletcher’s “The Separation of Powers: Critique of Some Utilitarian Justifications”
• Arthur S. Miller, “Judicial Activism and American Constitutionalism: Some Notes and Reflections”
• J. Ronald Pennock, “Epilogue”

 

 Nomos XXI: Compromise in Ethics, Law, and Politics, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1979

 

• Martin P. Golding, “The Nature of Compromise: A Preliminary Inquiry”
• Theodore M. Benditt, “Compromising Interests and Principles”
• Arthur Kuflik, “Morality and Compromise”
• David Resnick, “Justice, Compromise, and Constitutional Rules in Aristotle’s Politics”
• George Armstrong Kelly, “Mediation Versus Compromise in Hegel”
• Paul Thomas, “Marxism and Compromise: A Speculation”
• Joseph H. Carens, “Compromise in Politics”
• Edgard Bodenheimer, “Compromise in the Realization of Ideas and Values”
• Martin Shapiro, “Compromise and Litigation”
• Aleksander Peczenik, “Cumulation and Compromise of Reasons in the Law”
• John E. Coons, “Compromise as Precise Justice”

 Nomos XXII: Property, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1980

 

• Kenneth R. Minogue, “The Concept of Property and Its Contemporary Significance”
• Charles Donahue, Jr., “The Future of the Concept of Property Predicted From Its Past”
• Thomas C. Grey, “The Distintegration of Property”
• Christopher J. Berry, “Property and Possession: Two Replies to Locke—Hume and Hegel”
• Frederick G. Whelan, “Property As Artifice: Hume and Blackstone”
• Peter G. Stillman, “Property, Freedom, and Individuality in Marx’s Political Thought”
• J. Ronald Pennock, “Thoughts on the Right to Private Property”
• Lawrence C. Becker, “The Moral Basis of Property Rights”
• Richard E. Flathman, “On the Alleged Impossibility of an Unqualified Disjustificatory Theory of Property Rights”
• Hillel Steiner, “Slavery, Socialism, and Private Property”
• Jean Baechler, “Liberty, Property, and Equality”
• John W. Chapman, “Justice, Freedom, and Property”
• Duncan MacRae, Jr., “Scientific Policymaking and Compensation for the Taking of Property”
• T.M. Scanlon, “Comments on Ackerman’s Private Property and the Constiution”
• Bruce A. Ackerman, “Four Questions for Legal Theory”
• Lawrence G. Sager, “Property Rights and the Constitution”

 

 Nomos XXIII: Human Rights (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1981

 

• J. Roland Pennock, “Rights, Natural Rights, and Human Rights—A General View”
• John Charvet, “A Critique of Human Rights”
• Frithjof Bergmann, “Two Critiques of the Traditional Theory of Human Rights”
• Anthony T. Kronman, “Talent Pooling”
• John Gray, “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Utility, and Rights”
• Alan Gewirth, “The Basis and Content of Human Rights”
• Richard B. Friedman, “The Basis of Human Rights: A Criticism of Gewirth’s Theory
• Arval A. Morris, “A Differential Theory of Human Rights”
• Martin P. Golding, “From Prudence to Rights: A Critique”
• Jan Narveson, “Human Rights: Which, if Any, Are There?”
• Kurt Baier, “When Does the Right to Life Begin?
• Susan Moller Okin, “Liberty and Welfare: Some Issues in Human Rights Theory”
• Louis Henkin, “International Human Rights as ‘Rights’”
• William N. Nelson, “Human Rights and Human Obligations”

 

 Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics, and the Law (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1982

 

• Frank I. Michelman, ”Ethics, Economics, and the Law of Property”
• Harold Demsetz, “Professor Michelman’s Unnecessary and Futile Search for the Philosopher’s Touchstone”
• Richard A. Epstein, “Private Property and the Public Domain: The Case of Antitrust”
• Jules L. Coleman, “The Economic Analysis of Law”
• David Lyons, “Utility and Rights”
• Kent Greenawalt, “Utilitarian Justifications for Observance of Legal Rights”
• R.M. Hare, “Utility and Rights: Comment on David Lyons’s Essay”
• Alan Gewirth, “Can Utilitarianism Justify Any Moral Rights?”
• Richard E. Flathman, “Rights, Utility, and Civil Disobedience”
• George P. Fletcher, “Utility and Skepticism”
• Brian Barry, “Utility and Justice in Global Perspective”
• Kai Nielsen, “On the Need to Politicize Political Morality: World Hunger and Moral Obligation”
• Thomas M. Franck, “Political Functionalism and Philosophical Imperatives in the Fight for a New Economic Order”
• David A.J. Richards., “International Distributive Justice”
• Harry N. Scheiber, “Law and the Imperatives of Progress: Private Rights and Public Values in American Legal History”

 Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman

 

• Frederick G. Whelan, “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem”
• Stepehen L. Darwall, “Equal Representation”
• Charles R. Beitz, “Procedural Equality in Democratic Theory: A Preliminary Examination”
• Robert A. Dahl, “Federalism and the Democratic Process”
• David Braybrooke, “Can Democracy Be Combined with Federalism or with Liberalism?”
• Robert B. McKay, “Judicial Review in a Liberal Democracy”
• George Kateb, “Remarks on Robert B. McKay, ‘Judicial Review in a Liberal Democracy’”
• Peter Railton, “Judicial Review, Elites, and Liberal Democracy”
• Robert F. Nagel, “Interpretation and Importance in Constitutional Law: A Re-assessment of Judicial Restraint”
• David G. Smith, “Liberalism and Judicial Review”
• Frederick Schauer, “Free Speech and the Argument From Democracy”
• Amy Gutmann, “Is Freedom Academic?  The Relative Autonomy of Universities in a Liberal Democracy”
• Barry Holden, “Liberal Democracy and the Social Determination of Ideas”
• Kenneth I. Winston, “Toward a Liberal Conception of Legislation”
• William C. Mitchell, “Efficiency, Responsibility, and Democratic Politics”
• Robert E. Lane, “Individualism and the Market Society”
• J. Roland Pennock, “Epilogue: Some Perplexities Further Considered”

 

 Nomos XXVI: Marxism (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)

 

• Richard W. Miller, “Marx and Morality”
• Patrick Riley, “Marx and Morality: A Reply to Richard Miller”
• Frederick G. Whelan, “Marx and Revolutionary Virtue”
• Sheldon S. Wolin, “On Reading Marx Politically”
• Stephen Holmes, “On Reading Marx Apolitically”
• Alan Gilbert, “The Storming of Heaven: Politics and Marx’s Capital”
• Mark Tushnet, “Is There a Marxist Theory of Law?”
• Leon Lipson, “Is There a Marxist Theory of Law? Comments on Tushnet”
• Tom Gerety, “Iron Law: Why Good Lawyers Make Bad Marxists”
• G. A. Cohen, “Reconsidering Historical Materialism”
• Peter G. Stillman, “Marx’s Enterprise of Critique”
• Jon Elster, “Exploitation, Freedom, and Justice”

 Nomos XXVII: Criminal Justice (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)

 

• Michael S. Moore, “The Moral and Metaphysical Sources of the Criminal Law”
• Lawrence Rosen, “Intentionality and the Concept of the Person”
• Martin Shapiro, “The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Intent”
• Hugo Adam Bedau, “Classification-Based Sentencing: Some Conceptual and Ethical Problems”
• Michael Davis, “How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime”
• Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Retributivism and the State’s Interest In Punishment”
• R.B. Brandt, “A Motivational Theory of Excuses in the Criminal Law”
• Dennis F. Thompson, “Criminal Responsibility in Government”
• Christopher D. Stone, “A Comment on ‘Criminal Reponsibility in Government’”
• Susan Wolf, “The Legal and Moral Responsibility of Organizations”
• Alvin K. Klevorick, “On the Economic Theory of Crime”
• Richard A. Posner, “Comment on ‘On the Economic Theory of Crime’”
• Jules L. Coleman, “Crime, Kickers, and Transaction Structures”
• Stephen J. Schulhofer, “Is There an Economic Theory of Crime?”
  
  

 Nomos XXVIII: Justification (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)

 

• Kurt Baier, “Justification in Ethics”
• Felix E. Oppenheim, “Justification in Ethics: Its Limitations”
• Margaret Jane Radin, “Risk-of-Error Rules and Non-Ideal Justification”
• Michael D. Bayles, “Mid-Level Principles and Justification”
• Frank I. Michelman, “Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World”
• Christopher H. Schoreder, “Liberalism and the Objective Point of View: A Comment on Fishkin”
• Martin P. Golding, “A Note on Discovery and Justification in Science and Law”
• Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Rationality and Constraints on Democratic Rule”
• Amy Gutmann, “The Rule of Rights or the Right to Rule?”
• Jeffrey H. Reiman, “Law, Rights, and the Structure of Liberal Legal Justification”
• James S. Fishkin, “Liberal theory and the problem of justification”
• Barbara Baum Levenbrook, “Is There a Problem of Justification? A Reply to Fishkin”
• Gerald F. Gaus “Subjective Value and Justificatory Political Theory”
• Richard Dagger, “Politics and the Pursuit of Autonomy”
• J. Roland Pennock, “Justification in Politcs”
• J. Patrick  Dobel, “The End of Ethics–The Beginning of Politics”
• Thomas A. Spragens, Jr., “Justification, Practical Reason, and Political Theory”

 Nomos XXIX: Authority Revisited (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)

 

• William E. Connolly, “Modern Authority and Ambiguity”
• Frederick Schauer, “Authority and Indeterminacy”
• Terence Ball, “Authority and Conceptual Change”
• Steven Lukes, “Perspectives on Authority”
• Joseph Raz, “Government by Consent”
• Mark Tushnet, “Comment on Lukes”
• Nancy L. Rosenblum, “Studying Authority: Keeping Pluralism in Mind”
• Timothy Fuller, “Authority and the Individual in Civil Association: Oakeshott, Flathman, Yves Simon”
• Kathleen B. Jones, “On Authority: Or, Why Women are not Entitled to Speak”
• Kim Lane Scheppele and Karol Edward Soltan, “The Authority of Alternatives”
• Russell Hardin, “Does Might Make Right?”
• Michael J. Perry, “The Authority of Text, Tradition, and Reason: A Theory of Constitutional ‘Interpretation’”
• Austin Sarat, “In the Shadow of Originalism: A Comment on Perry”
• Martin P. Golding, “Sacred Texts and Authority in Constitutional Interpretation”
• Michael D. Bayles, “The Justification of Administrative Authority”
• Michael Davis, “The Moral Authority of a Professional Code

 

 Nomos XXX: Religion, Morality, and the Law (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)

 

• Stephen Holmes, “Jean Bodin: The Paradox of Sovereignty and the Privatization of Religion”
• Eric Mack, “Liberalism, Neutralism, and Rights”