Fifty Years
of Nomos
The Yearbook of the American Society for
Political and Legal Philosophy
General Editors of Nomos:
Carl J. Friederich, volumes
I-IX
J. Roland Pennock, IX-XXXI, and John W.
Chapman, volumes IX- XXXV
Ian Shapiro, volumes XXXV-
XLII
Stephen Macedo, volumes
XLII-XLVI
Melissa S. Williams, volumes
XLVI-
Nomos I: Authority (ed. Carl
J. Friedrich), 1958
- Charles W. Hendel, “An Exploration of the Nature of
Authority”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Authority, Reason, and Discretion”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Authority, Values, and Policy”
- Jerome Hall, “Authority and the Law”
- Frank H. Knight, “Authority and the Free Society”
- Hannah Arendt, “What Was Authority?”
- Norman Jacobson, “Knowledge, Tradition, and Authority:
A Note on the American Experience”
- George E. Gordon Caitlin, “Authority and Its Critics”
- Wolfgang H. Kraus, “Authority, Progress, and
Colonialism”
- Bertrand de Jouvenal, “Authority: The Efficient
Imperative”
- David Easton, “The Perception of Authority and Social
Change”
- Talcott Parsons, “Authority, Legitimation, and
Political Action”
- E. Adamson Hoebel, “Authority in Primitive
Societies”
Nomos II: Community (ed. Carl
J. Friedrich), 1959
- Carl J. Friedrich, “The Concept of Community in
Political and Legal Philosophy”
- Huntington Cairns, “The Community as the Legal
Order”
- Stuart M. Brown, Jr., “The Community as the Legal
Order Reviewed”
- William Y. Elliot, “The Co-Organic Concept of
Community Applied to Legal Analysis: Constitutional and Totalitarian Regimes
Compared”
- Dante Germino, “The Crisis in Community: Challenge to
Political Theory”
- Jacob Taubes, “Communitu—After the Apocalypse”
- George E. Gordon Caitlin, “The Meaning of Community”
- Benjamin Nelson, “Community—Dreams and Realities”
- Talcott Parsons, “The Principle Structures of
Community: A Sociological View”
- Thomas A. Cowan, “The Principle Structure of Community
Reviewed”
- Warren Roberts, “Community as Matrix”
- Herbert W. Schneider, “Community, Communication, and
Communion”
- Wolfgang H. Kraus, “The Democratic Community and the
Problem of Publicity”
- Lon Fuller, “Governmental Secrecy and the Forms of
Social Order”
- John Ladd, “The Concept of Community: A Logical
Analysis”
Nomos III: Responsibility (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1960
- J. Roland Pennock, “The Problem of
Responsibility”
- Ludwig Freund, “Responsibility—Definitions,
Distinctions, and Applications in Various Contexts”
- George A. Schrader, “Responsibility and
Existence”
- Margaret Spahr, “The Role of the Supreme Court in the
Integration of the American Community”
- Wayne A. Leys, “Platonic, Pragmatic, and Political
Responsibility”
- Edgar Bodenheimer, “Is Punishment Obsolete?”
- Richard B. Brandt, “The Conditions of Criminal
Responsibility”
- Henry Weihofen, “Retribution is Obsolete”
- K.J. Newman, “Punishment and the Breakdown of the
Legal Order: The Experience in East
Pakistan”
- Thomas E. Davitt, “Criminal Responsibility and
Punishment”
- Joel Feinberg, “On Justifying Legal Punishment”
- Frank H. Knight, “”Political Responsibility in a
Democracy”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “The Dilemma of Administrative
Responsibility”
- Warren Roberts, “Reflections on Administration
Integrity”
- John W. Chapman, “Metropolitan Citizenship: Promises
and Limitations”
- Arnold S. Kaufman, “Human Nature and Participatory
Democracy”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Responsibility and the Goal of
Survival”
- John Austin, “Three Ways of Spilling Ink”
Nomos IV: Liberty (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1962
- Leonard Krieger, “Stages in the History of Political
Freedom”
- I. Fetscher, “Rousseau’s Concepts of Freedom in Light
of His Philosophy of History”
- Albert A. Mavrinac, “Freedom, Authority, Conscience,
and Development: Mill, Acton, and Some Contemporary Catholic
Thinkers”
- William Ebenstein, “John Stuart Mill: Political and
Economic Liberty”
- Frank H. Knight, “Some Notes on Political Freedom and
On a Famous Essay”
- Henry D. Aiken, “Mill and the Justification of Social
Freedom”
- Elizabeth F. Flower, “Mill and Some Present Concerns
About Ethical Judgments”
- Margaret Spahr, “Mill on Paternalism In Its
Place”
- David Spitz, “Freedom and Individuality: Mil’s
Liberty in
Retrospect”
- Harry W. Jones, “Freedom and Opportunity as Competing
Social Values: Mill’s Liberty and Ours”
- Arnold Brecht, “Liberty and Truth: The Responsibility of
Science”
- Mark DeWolfe Howe, “Problems of Religious
Liberty”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Freedom—an Empirical
Interpretation”
- John Somerville, “Toward a Constant Definition of
Freedom and Its Relation to Value”
- Karl W. Deutsch, “Strategies of Freedom: The Widening
of Choices and the Change of Goals”
- Andrew Hacker, “Freedom and Power: Common Men and
Uncommon Men”
Nomos V: The Public Interest
(ed. Carl J. Friedrich),
1962
- Gerhart Niemeyer, “Public Interest and Private
Utility”
- Ernest S. Griffith, “The Ethical Foundation of the
Public Interest”
- William S. Minor, “Public Interest and Ultimate
Cmmitment”
- C. W. Cassinelli, “The Public Interest in Political
Ethics”
- Harold Lasswell, “The Public Interest: Proposing
Principles of Content and Procedure”
- Wolfgang Friedmann, “The Changing Content of Public
Interest”
- George Nakhnikian, “Common and Public Interest
Defined”
- Stephen K. Bailey, “The Public Interest: Some
Operational Dilemmas”
- Richard Musgrave, “The Public Interest: Efficiency in
the Creation and Maintenance of Material Welfare”
- Gerhard Colm, “The Public Interest: Essential Key to
Public Policy”
- David V. Braybrooke, “The Public Interest: The Present
and Future of the Concept”
- Julius Cohen, “A Lawman’s View of the Public
Interest”
- Glendon Schubert, “Is There A Public Interest
Theory?”
- J. Roland Pennock, “The One and the Many: A Note on
the Concept”
- Frank J. Sorauf, “The Conceptual Middle”
- Brian Barry, “The Use and Abuse of ‘The Public
Interest’”
- Edgar Bodenheimer, “Prolegomena to a Theory of the
Public Interest”
- John D. Montgomery, “Public Interest and the
Ideologies of National Development”
- Wayne Leys, “The Relevance and Generality of ‘The Public
Interest’”
Nomos VI: Justice (eds. Carl J. Friedrich and John W. Chapman),
1963
- Frank H. Knight, “On the Meaning of
Justice”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Justice: The Just Political
Act”
- Richard McKeon, “Justice and
Equality”
- Arnold Brecht, “The Ultimate Standard of
Justice”
- Joel Feinberg, “Justice and Personal Desert”
- John Rawls, “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept
of Justice”
- Charles Fried, “Justice and Liberty”
- John W. Chapman, “Justice and
Fairness”
- Clarence Morris, “Law, Justice and the Public’s
Aspirations”
- Iredell Jenkins, “Justice as Ideal and
Ideology”
- David Granfield, “The Scholastic Dispute on Justice:
Aquinas versus Ockham”
- Richard H. Cox, “Justice As the Basis of the Political
Order in Locke”
- Raymond Polin, “Justice in Locke’s
Philosophy”
- Hugo A. Bedau, “Justice and Classical
Utilitarianism”
- Robert C. Tucker, “Marx and Distributive
Justice”
Nomos VII: Rational Decision
(ed. Carl J. Friedrich),
1964
- Judith N. Shklar, “Decisionism”
- William K. Frankena, “Decisionism and Separatism in
Social Philosophy”
- Heinz Eulau, “Logics of Rationality in Unanimous
Decision-Making”
- Abraham Kaplan, “Some Limits on
Rationality”
- Gottfried Dietze, “The Limited Rationality of
Law”
- Murray L. Schwartz, “The Separation of Legal and Moral
Decisions”
- J. Roland Pennock, “Reason in Legislative
Decisions”
- Paul A. Freund, “Rationality in Judicial
Decisions”
- John Ladd, “The Place of Practical Reason in Judicial
Decision”
- A.A. Mavrinac, “Political Privacy, the Courts, and the
Worlds of Reason and Life”
- Margaret Spahr, “When the Supreme Court Subordinates
Judicial Reason to Legislation”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “On Rereading Machiavelli and
Althusius: Reason, Rationality, and Religion”
- Harvey C. Mansfield, “Rationality and Representation
in Burke’s ‘Bristol Speech’”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rational Decisions and Intrinsic
Valuations”
- Sir Isaiah Berlin, “On the Rationality of Value
Judgments”
- Charles E. Lindblom, “Some Limitations on Rationality:
A Comment”
Nomos VIII: Revolution (ed. Carl J. Friedrich), 1966
- Carl J. Friederich, “An Introductory Note on
Revolution”
- George Pettee, “Revolution: Typology and
Progress”
- Paul Schrecker, “Revolution as a Problem in the
Philosophy of History”
- David C. Rapoport, “Coup d’état: The View of the Men
Firing Pistols”
- Melvin Richter, “Tocqueville’s Contributions to the
Theory of Revolution”
- Eugene Kamenka, “The Concept of a Political
Revolution”
- C.B. MacPherson, “Revolution and Ideology in the Late
Twentieth Century”
- Richard A. Falk, “World Revolution and International
Order”
- Manfred Halpern, “The Revolution of Modernization in
National and International Society”
- Robert C. Tucker, “The Marxian Revolutionary
Idea”
- David Braybrooke, “Marx on Revolutionizing the Mode of
Production”
Nomos IX: Equality, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman,
1967
- Hugo Adam Bedau, “Egalitarianism and the Idea of
Equality”
- Norman Dorsen, “A Lawyer’s Look at Egalitarianism and
Equality”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Equality and Generalization, a
Formal Analysis”
- Stanley I. Benn, “Egalitarianism and the Equal Consideration of
Interests”
- John Plamenatz, “Diversity of Rights and Kinds of
Equality”
- George E.G. Catlin, “Equality and What We Mean By
It”
- Sanford A. Lakoff, “Christianity and
Equality”
- Paul E. Sigmund, “Hierarchy, Equality, and Consent in
Medieval Political Thought”
- Emanuel Rackman, “Judaism and
Equality”
- A.H. Somjee, “Individuality and Equality in
Hinduism”
- Herbert Spielberg, “Equality in
Existentialism”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “A Brief Discourse on the Origin of
Political Equality”
- John H. Schaar, “Equality of Opportunity, and Beyond”
- Monroe H. Freedman, “Equality in the Administration of
Criminal Justice”
- Geoffrey Marshall, “Notes on the Rule of Equal
Law”
- D.D. Raphael, “Equality, Democracy, and International
Law”
- Robert W. Gregg, “Equality of States Within the United
Nations”
- Thomas M. Franck, “Equality and Inequality of States
in the United Nations”
Nomos X: Representation, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman
1968
- J. Roland Pennock, ”Political Representation: An
Overview”
- B.J. Diggs, “Practical
Representation”
- Hanna Pitkin, “Commentary: The Paradox of
Representation”
- Julius Cohen, “Commentary: Representation and the
Problem of Identity”
- William K. Frankena, “Two Notes on
Representation”
- Harvey C. Manfield, Jr., “Modern and Medieval
Representation”
- Isaac Kramnick, “An Augustan Debate: Notes on the
History of the Idea of Representation”
- Marek Sobolewski, “Electors and Representatives: A
Contribution to the Theory of Representation”
- Eric A. Nordlinger, “Representation, Governmental
Stability, and Decisional Effectiveness”
- Charles L. Black, Jr., “Representation in Law and
Equity”
- Stuart M. Brown Jr., “Black on Representation: A
Question”
- Donald E. Stokes, “Political Parties in the Normative
Theory of Representation”
- Lewis A. Dexter, “Standards for Representative
Selection and Apportionment”
- Robert G. Dixon, Jr., “Representation Values and
Reapportionment Practice: The Eschatology of ‘One-Man,
One-Vote’”
- William H. Riker and Lloyd S. Shapley, “Weighted
Voting: A Mathematical Anaysis for Instrumental Judgments”
- Robert Nozick, “Weighted Voting and ‘One-Man,
One-Vote’”
- Joseph P. Witherspoon, “The Bureaucracy as
Representatives”
- Witold Zakrzewski, “The Mechanism of Popular Activity
in the Exercise of State Authority in People’s Poland”
- David E. Apter, “Notes for a Theory of Nondemocratic
Representation”
Nomos XI: Voluntary
Associations (eds. J. Roland Pennock
and John W. Chapman), 1969
- Lon L. Fuller, ”Two Principles of Human
Association”
- Abraham Edel, “Commentary: Shared Commitment and the
Legal Principle”
- Henry S. Kariel, “Commentary: Transcending
Privcy”
- H.S. Harris, “Voluntary Association as a Rational
Ideal”
- Willard Hurst, “Commentary: Constitutional Ideals and
Private Associations”
- Leonard G. Boonin, “Man and Society: An Examination of
Three Models”
- John W. Chapman, “Voluntary Association and the
Political Theory of Pluralism”
- Maure L. oldschmidt, “Rousseau on Intermediate
Association”
- George Kateb, “Some Remarks on Tocqueville’s View of
Voluntary Associations”
- Grant McConnell, “The Public Values of the Private
Association”
- David Sidorsky, “Commentary: Pluralism, Empiricism,
and the Secondary Association”
- William Leon McBride, “Voluntary Association: The
Basis of an Ideal Model, and the ‘Democratic’ Failure”
- Arthur Selwyn Miller, “The Constitution and the
Voluntary Association: Some Notes Toward a Theory”
- Suzanne Berger, “Corporative Association: The Case of
a French Rural Association”
Nomos XII: Political and Legal
Obligation, eds., J. Roland Pennock and
John W. Chapman, 1970
- John Ladd, “Legal and Moral
Obligation”
- Jeffrie G. Murphy, “In Defense of
Obligation”
- Mark MacGuigan, “Obligation and
Obedience”
- Alan Gewirth, “Obligation: Political, Legal,
Moral”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Obligations, Ideals, and
Ability”
- Kurt Baier, “Obligation: Political and
Moral”
- John W. Chapman, “The Moral Foundations of Political
Obligation”
- Gray L. Dorsey, “Constitutional
Obligation”
- Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “On Feeling Obligated to Do
What a Constitution Requires”
- Stuart S. Nagel, “Causes and Effects of Constitutional
Compliance”
- David C. Rappaport, “Rome: Fides and Obsequium, Rise and
Fall”
- Nannerl O. Henry, “Political Obligation and Collective
Goods”
- James Luther Adams, “Civil Disobedience: Its Occasions
and Limits”
- Kent Greenawalt, “A Contextual Approach to Civil
Disobedience”
- Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., “Some Truths and Untruths
About Civil Disobedience”
- Michael Walzer, “Political Alienation and Military
Service”
- Alfred G. Meyer, “Political Change through Civil
Disobedience in the USSR
and Eastern Europe”
- Wayne A.R. Leys and P.S.S. Rama Rao, “Gandhi’s
Synthesis of Indian Spirituality and Western Politics”
Nomos XIII: Privacy (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman),
1971
- Stanley
I.
Benn, “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Persons”
- W.L. Weinstein, “The Private and the Free: A
Conceptual Inquiry”
- Elizabeth L. Beardsley, “Privacy: Autonomy and
Selective Disclosure”
- Arnold Simmel, “Privacy is Not an Isolated
Freedom”
- Michael A. Weinstein, “The Uses of Privacy in the Good
Life”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Secrecy vs. Privacy,” The
Democratic Dilemma”
- Herbert J. Spiro, “Privacy in Comparative
Perspective”
- Ernest van den Haag, “On Privacy”
- Hyman Gross, “Privacy and Autonomy”
- Paul A. Freund, “Privacy: One Concept or
Many”
- John M. Roberts and Thomas Gregor, “Privacy: A
Cultural View”
- John R. Silber, “Masks and Fig
Leaves”
- John W. Chapman, “Personality and
Privacy”
Nomos XIV: Coercion, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman,
1972
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Coercion: an
Overview”
- Michael D. Bayles, “A Concept of
Coercion”
- Bernard Gert, “Coercion and Freedom”
- Virginia Held, “Coercion and Coercive
Offers”
- Michael A. Weinstein, “Coercion, Space, and the Modes
of Human Domination”
- Robert K. Faulkner, “Spontaneity, Justice, and
Coercion: On Nicomachean Ethics,
Books III and V”
- Samuel DuBois Cook, “Coercion and Social
Change”
- Robert Paul Wolff,. “Is Coercion ‘Ethically
Neutral’?”
- J. Howard Sobel, “The Need for
Coercion”
- William Leon McBride, “Noncoercive Society: Some
Doubts, Leninist and Contemporary”
- William H. Riker, “Trust as an Alternative to
Coercion”
- Alan P. Wertheimer, “Political Coercion and Political
Obligation”
- Donald McIntosh, “Coercion and International Politics:
A Theoretical Analysis”
- Robert Jervis, “Bargaining and Bargaining
Tactics”
- John W. Chapman, “Coercion in Politics and
Strategy”
Nomos XV: The Limits of
Law, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John
W. Chapman, 1974
- David J. Danelski, “The Limits of
Law”
- William Leon McBride, “An Overview of Future
Possibilities: Law Unlimited?”
- Julius Cohen, “Perspectives on the Limits of
Law”
- June Louin Tapp, “The Psychological Limits of
Legality”
- Kent Greenawalt, “Some Related Limits of
Law”
- Sergio Cotta, “Law Between Ethics and Politics: A
Phenomenological Approach”
- Michael W. Weinstein, “A Binary Theory of the Limits of
Law”
- Graham Hughes, “Social Justice and the
Courts”
- Alan Dershowitz, “Toward a Jurisprudence of ‘Harm’
Prevention”
- Stephen L. Wasby, “Beyond Dershowitz: Limits in
Attempting to Secure Change”
- Martin P. Golding, “Is Civil Commitment a
Mistake?”
- Michael D. Bayles, “Criminal
Paternalism”
- Donald H. Regan, “Justifications for
Paternalism”
- Kenneth M. Dolbeare, “Law and Social Consequences:
Some Conceptual Problems and Alternatives”
- Jerome Hall, “Jurisprudential Theories and the
Effectiveness of Law”
- Hugo Adam Bedau, “Our Knowledge of Law’s Limited
Effectiveness”
- Victor G. Rosenblum, “Of Beneficiaries and
Compliance”
Nomos XVI: Participation in
Politics (eds. J. Roland Pennock and
John W. Chapman), 1975
- Donald W. Keim, “Participation in Contemporary
Democratic Theories”
- Peter Bachrach, “Interest, Participation, and
Democratic Theory”
- David Braybrooke, “The Meaning of Participation and
the Demands For It: A Preliminary Survey of the Conceptual
Issues”
- George Kateb, “Comments on David Braybrooke’s ‘The
Meaning of Participation and the Demands For It: A Preliminary Survey of the
Conceptual Issues’”
- John Ladd, “The Ethics of
Participation”
- M.B.E. Smith, “The Value of
Participation”
- Samuel Mermin, “Participation in Governmental
Processes: A Sketch of the Expanding Law”
- Howard I. Kalodner, “Citizen Participation in Emerging
Social Institutions”
- Stephen Wexler, “Expert and Lay Participation in
Decision Making”
- Carl J. Friedrich, “Participation Without
Responsibility: Codetermination in Industry and University”
- David G. Smith, “Professional Responsibility and
Political Participation”
- Lisa H. Newton, “The Community and the Cattle-pen: An
Analysis of Participation”
- Jane J. Mansbridge, “The Limits of
Friendship”
- Alan Wertheimer, “In Defense of Compulsory
Voting”
Nomos XVII: Human Nature in
Politics, eds., J. Roland Pennock and
John W. Chapman, 1977
- Peter A. Corning, “Human Nature Redivivus”
- Roger D. Masters, “Human Nature, Nature, and Political
Thought”
- George Armstrong Kelly, “Politics, Violence, and Human
Nature”
- Lisa H. Newton, “The Political
Animal”
- James Chowning Davies, “The Priority of Human Needs
and the Stages of Human Development”
- Donald W. Keim, “To Make All Things New”—The
Counterculture Vision of Man and Politics
- Marvin Zetterbaum, “Human Nature and
History”
- Lyman Tower Sargent, “Human Nature and the Radical
Vision”
- Richard Brandt, “The Concept of Rationality in Ethical
and Political Theory”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Rationality and
Egalitarianism”
- Bernard Gert, “Irrational Desires”
- John W. Chapman, “Toward a General Theory of Human
Nature and Dynamics”
Nomos XVIII: Due Process, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman,
1977
- Charles A. Mills, “The Forest of Due Process of Law: The American
Constitutional Tradition”
- Gerald Kramer, “Some Procedural Aspects of Majority
Rule”
- Geoffrey Marshall, “Due Process in England”
- T.M. Scanlon, “Due Process”
- Frank Michelman, “Formal and Associational Aims in Due
Process”
- Edmund Pincoffs, “Due Process, Fraternity, and the
Kantian Injunction”
- Thomas C. Grey, “Procedural Fairness and Substantive
Rights”
- David Resnick, “Due Process and Procedural
Justice”
- Thomas Kearns, “On De-Moralizing Due Process”
- David J. Danielski, “Due Process in a Nonlegal
Setting: An Ombudsman’s Experience”
- Arthur Kuflick, “Majority Rule Procedure”
- Richard Epstein, “Voting Theory, Union Elections, and
the Constitution”
Nomos XIX: Anarchism (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman),
1978
- Gerald F. Gaus and John W. Chapman, “Anarchism and
Political Philosophy: An Introduction”
- John P. Clark, “What Is Anarchism?”
- James M. Buchanan, “A Contractarian Perspective on
Anarchy”
- Eric Mack, “Nozick’s Anarchism”
- Richard A. Falk, “Anarchism and World
Order”
- Richard T. De George, “Anarchism and
Authority”
- Richard Wasserstrom, “Comments on ‘Anarchism and
Authority’”
- Rex Martin, “Anarchism and
Skepticism”
- Alan Ritter, “The Anarchist Justification of
Authority”
- Lester J. Mazor, “Disrespect for
Law”
- Lisa Newton, “The Profoundest Respect for Law: Mazor’s
Anarchy and the Political Association”
- Alan Wertheimer, “Disrespect for Law and the Case for
Anarchy”
- Murray N. Rothbard,
“Society Without a State”
- Christopher D. Stone, “Some Reflection on Arbitrating
Our Way to Anarchy”
- David Wieck, “Anarchist Justice”
- Donald McIntosh, “The Dimensions of
Anarchy”
- Grenville Wall, “Philosophical Anarchism
Revisited”
- Patrick Riley, “On the ‘Kantian’ Foundation of Robert
Paul Wolff’s Anarchism”
- April Carter, “Anarchism and
Violence”
Nomos XX:
Constitutionalism, eds., J. Roland
Pennock and John W. Chapman, 1979
- Gordon J. Shochet, “Introduction: Constitutionalism,
Liberalism, and the Study of Politics”
- Dante Germino, “Carl J. Friedrich on Constitutionalism
and the ‘Great Tradition’ of Political Theory”
- Paul Sigmund, “Carl Friedrich’s Contribution to the
Theory of Constitutionalism- Comparative Government”
- Nannerl O. Keohane, “Claude de Seyssel and
Sixteenth-Century Constitutionalism in France”
- Cecelia M. Kenyon, “Constitutionalism in Revolutionary
America”
- Wilfrid E. Rumble, “James Madison on the Value of
Bills of Rights”
- Christopher C. Mojekwu, “Nigerian
Constitutionalism”
- Thomas C. Grey, “Constitutionalism: An Analytic
Framework”
- William J. Bennett, “A Comment on Cecelia Kenyon’s
‘Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America”
- George Kateb, “Remarks on the Procedures of
Constitutional Democracy”
- Ronald Moore, “Rawls on
Constitution-Making”
- Richard B. Parker, “The Jurisprudential Uses of John
Rawls”
- George P. Fletcher, “The Separation of Powers: A
Critique of Some Utilitarian Justifications”
- Stephanie R. Lewis, “Comments on George P. Fletcher’s
“The Separation of Powers: Critique of Some Utilitarian
Justifications”
- Arthur S. Miller, “Judicial Activism and American
Constitutionalism: Some Notes and Reflections”
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Epilogue”
Nomos XXI: Compromise in Ethics, Law, and
Politics, eds., J. Roland Pennock and
John W. Chapman, 1979
- Martin P. Golding, “The Nature of Compromise: A
Preliminary Inquiry”
- Theodore M. Benditt, “Compromising Interests and
Principles”
- Arthur Kuflik, “Morality and
Compromise”
- David Resnick, “Justice, Compromise, and
Constitutional Rules in Aristotle’s Politics”
- George Armstrong Kelly, “Mediation Versus Compromise
in Hegel”
- Paul Thomas, “Marxism and Compromise: A
Speculation”
- Joseph H. Carens, “Compromise in
Politics”
- Edgard Bodenheimer, “Compromise in the Realization of
Ideas and Values”
- Martin Shapiro, “Compromise and
Litigation”
- Aleksander Peczenik, “Cumulation and Compromise of
Reasons in the Law”
- John E. Coons, “Compromise as Precise
Justice”
Nomos XXII: Property, eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman,
1980
- Kenneth R. Minogue, “The Concept of Property and Its
Contemporary Significance”
- Charles Donahue, Jr., “The Future of the Concept of
Property Predicted From Its Past”
- Thomas C. Grey, “The Distintegration of
Property”
- Christopher J. Berry, “Property and Possession: Two
Replies to Locke—Hume and Hegel”
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Property As Artifice: Hume and
Blackstone”
- Peter G. Stillman, “Property, Freedom, and
Individuality in Marx’s Political Thought”
- J. Ronald Pennock, “Thoughts on the Right to Private
Property”
- Lawrence C. Becker, “The Moral Basis of Property
Rights”
- Richard E. Flathman, “On the Alleged Impossibility of
an Unqualified Disjustificatory Theory of Property Rights”
- Hillel Steiner, “Slavery, Socialism, and Private
Property”
- Jean Baechler, “Liberty, Property, and
Equality”
- John W. Chapman, “Justice, Freedom, and
Property”
- Duncan MacRae, Jr., “Scientific Policymaking and
Compensation for the Taking of Property”
- T.M. Scanlon, “Comments on Ackerman’s Private Property and the
Constiution”
- Bruce A. Ackerman, “Four Questions for Legal
Theory”
- Lawrence G. Sager, “Property Rights and the
Constitution”
Nomos XXIII: Human Rights
(eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W.
Chapman), 1981
- J. Roland Pennock, “Rights, Natural Rights, and Human
Rights—A General View”
- John Charvet, “A Critique of Human
Rights”
- Frithjof Bergmann, “Two Critiques of the Traditional
Theory of Human Rights”
- Anthony T. Kronman, “Talent Pooling”
- John Gray, “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Utility, and
Rights”
- Alan Gewirth, “The Basis and Content of Human
Rights”
- Richard B. Friedman, “The Basis of Human Rights: A
Criticism of Gewirth’s Theory
- Arval A. Morris, “A Differential Theory of Human
Rights”
- Martin P. Golding, “From Prudence to Rights: A
Critique”
- Jan Narveson, “Human Rights: Which, if Any, Are
There?”
- Kurt Baier, “When Does the Right to Life
Begin?
- Susan Moller Okin, “Liberty and Welfare: Some Issues in Human
Rights Theory”
- Louis Henkin, “International Human Rights as
‘Rights’”
- William N. Nelson, “Human Rights and Human
Obligations”
Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics, and the
Law (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman), 1982
- Frank I. Michelman, ”Ethics, Economics, and the Law of
Property”
- Harold Demsetz, “Professor Michelman’s Unnecessary and
Futile Search for the Philosopher’s Touchstone”
- Richard A. Epstein, “Private Property and the Public
Domain: The Case of Antitrust”
- Jules L. Coleman, “The Economic Analysis of
Law”
- David Lyons, “Utility and Rights”
- Kent Greenawalt, “Utilitarian Justifications for
Observance of Legal Rights”
- R.M. Hare, “Utility and Rights: Comment on David
Lyons’s Essay”
- Alan Gewirth, “Can Utilitarianism Justify Any Moral
Rights?”
- Richard E. Flathman, “Rights, Utility, and Civil
Disobedience”
- George P. Fletcher, “Utility and
Skepticism”
- Brian Barry, “Utility and Justice in Global
Perspective”
- Kai Nielsen, “On the Need to Politicize Political
Morality: World Hunger and Moral Obligation”
- Thomas M. Franck, “Political Functionalism and
Philosophical Imperatives in the Fight for a New Economic
Order”
- David A.J. Richards., “International Distributive
Justice”
- Harry N. Scheiber, “Law and the Imperatives of
Progress: Private Rights and Public Values in American Legal
History”
Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy,
eds., J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Prologue: Democratic Theory and
the Boundary Problem”
- Stepehen L. Darwall, “Equal
Representation”
- Charles R. Beitz, “Procedural Equality in Democratic
Theory: A Preliminary Examination”
- Robert A. Dahl, “Federalism and the Democratic
Process”
- David Braybrooke, “Can Democracy Be Combined with
Federalism or with Liberalism?”
- Robert B. McKay, “Judicial Review in a Liberal
Democracy”
- George Kateb, “Remarks on Robert B. McKay, ‘Judicial
Review in a Liberal Democracy’”
- Peter Railton, “Judicial Review, Elites, and Liberal
Democracy”
- Robert F. Nagel, “Interpretation and Importance in
Constitutional Law: A Re-assessment of Judicial Restraint”
- David G. Smith, “Liberalism and Judicial
Review”
- Frederick Schauer, “Free Speech and the Argument From
Democracy”
- Amy Gutmann, “Is Freedom Academic? The Relative Autonomy of Universities
in a Liberal Democracy”
- Barry Holden, “Liberal Democracy and the Social
Determination of Ideas”
- Kenneth I. Winston, “Toward a Liberal Conception of
Legislation”
- William C. Mitchell, “Efficiency, Responsibility, and
Democratic Politics”
- Robert E.
Lane,
“Individualism and the Market Society”
- J. Roland Pennock, “Epilogue: Some Perplexities
Further Considered”
Nomos XXVI: Marxism (eds. J.
Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)
- Richard W. Miller, “Marx and
Morality”
- Patrick Riley, “Marx and Morality: A Reply to Richard
Miller”
- Frederick G. Whelan, “Marx and Revolutionary
Virtue”
- Sheldon S. Wolin, “On Reading Marx
Politically”
- Stephen Holmes, “On Reading Marx
Apolitically”
- Alan Gilbert, “The Storming of Heaven: Politics and
Marx’s Capital”
- Mark Tushnet, “Is There a Marxist Theory of
Law?”
- Leon Lipson, “Is There a Marxist Theory of Law?
Comments on Tushnet”
- Tom Gerety, “Iron Law: Why Good Lawyers Make Bad
Marxists”
- G. A. Cohen, “Reconsidering Historical
Materialism”
- Peter G. Stillman, “Marx’s Enterprise of
Critique”
- Jon Elster, “Exploitation, Freedom, and
Justice”
Nomos XXVII: Criminal Justice (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W.
Chapman)
- Michael S. Moore, “The Moral and Metaphysical Sources
of the Criminal Law”
- Lawrence Rosen, “Intentionality and the Concept of the
Person”
- Martin Shapiro, “The Deconstruction and Reconstruction
of Intent”
- Hugo Adam Bedau, “Classification-Based Sentencing:
Some Conceptual and Ethical Problems”
- Michael Davis, “How to Make the Punishment Fit the
Crime”
- Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Retributivism and the State’s
Interest In Punishment”
- R.B. Brandt, “A Motivational Theory of Excuses in the
Criminal Law”
- Dennis F. Thompson, “Criminal Responsibility in
Government”
- Christopher D. Stone, “A Comment on ‘Criminal
Reponsibility in Government’”
- Susan Wolf, “The Legal and Moral Responsibility of
Organizations”
- Alvin K. Klevorick, “On the Economic Theory of
Crime”
- Richard A. Posner, “Comment on ‘On the Economic Theory
of Crime’”
- Jules L. Coleman, “Crime, Kickers, and Transaction
Structures”
- Stephen J. Schulhofer, “Is There an Economic Theory of
Crime?”
Nomos XXVIII: Justification (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W.
Chapman)
- Kurt Baier, “Justification in
Ethics”
- Felix E. Oppenheim, “Justification in Ethics: Its
Limitations”
- Margaret Jane Radin, “Risk-of-Error Rules and
Non-Ideal Justification”
- Michael D. Bayles, “Mid-Level Principles and
Justification”
- Frank I. Michelman, “Justification (and
Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World”
- Christopher H. Schoreder, “Liberalism and the
Objective Point of View: A Comment on Fishkin”
- Martin P. Golding, “A Note on Discovery and
Justification in Science and Law”
- Jeffrie G. Murphy, “Rationality and Constraints on
Democratic Rule”
- Amy Gutmann, “The Rule of Rights or the Right to
Rule?”
- Jeffrey H. Reiman, “Law, Rights, and the Structure of
Liberal Legal Justification”
- James S. Fishkin, “Liberal theory and the problem of
justification”
- Barbara Baum Levenbrook, “Is There a Problem of
Justification? A Reply to Fishkin”
- Gerald F. Gaus “Subjective Value and Justificatory
Political Theory”
- Richard Dagger, “Politics and the Pursuit of
Autonomy”
- J. Roland Pennock, “Justification in
Politcs”
- J. Patrick Dobel, “The End of Ethics–The Beginning of
Politics”
- Thomas A. Spragens, Jr., “Justification, Practical
Reason, and Political Theory”
Nomos XXIX: Authority Revisited (eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W.
Chapman)
- William E. Connolly, “Modern Authority and
Ambiguity”
- Frederick Schauer, “Authority and
Indeterminacy”
- Terence Ball, “Authority and Conceptual
Change”
- Steven Lukes, “Perspectives on
Authority”
- Joseph Raz, “Government by
Consent”
- Mark Tushnet, “Comment on
Lukes”
- Nancy L. Rosenblum, “Studying Authority: Keeping
Pluralism in Mind”
- Timothy Fuller, “Authority and the Individual in Civil
Association: Oakeshott, Flathman, Yves Simon”
- Kathleen B. Jones, “On Authority: Or, Why Women are
not Entitled to Speak”
- Kim Lane Scheppele and Karol Edward Soltan, “The
Authority of Alternatives”
- Russell Hardin, “Does Might Make
Right?”
- Michael J. Perry, “The Authority of Text, Tradition,
and Reason: A Theory of Constitutional
‘Interpretation’”
- Austin Sarat, “In the Shadow of Originalism: A Comment
on Perry”
- Martin P. Golding, “Sacred Texts and Authority in
Constitutional Interpretation”
- Michael D. Bayles, “The Justification of
Administrative Authority”
- Michael Davis, “The Moral Authority of a Professional
Code
Nomos XXX: Religion, Morality, and the Law (eds. J.
Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman)
- Stephen Holmes, “Jean Bodin: The Paradox of
Sovereignty and the Privatization of Religion”
- Eric Mack, “Liberalism, Neutralism, and
Rights”